From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs on OS X development Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:00:36 -0500 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <87r4s68rr4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83A41E83-79C8-4490-966B-CD224041E840@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343084448 19126 80.91.229.3 (23 Jul 2012 23:00:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:00:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 24 01:00:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1StRcJ-00026Q-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:00:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42999 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRcJ-0005WI-8v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50487) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRcF-0005W2-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:00:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRcE-0001qi-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:00:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gh0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:48610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1StRcE-0001qa-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: by ghrr18 with SMTP id r18so7178509ghr.0 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:00:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:organization:references:mail-followup-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=9kF9L9KPZuMyLXGSOURH6iZ+alX30fwQK380fpep/pk=; b=Dn8S3QYH6Mn6czMJvojIYOCWBZEBY+m6WIYA91v048siyedCNQZD4jJ7vsjUOqf9Jq xIfu1rtNeRTaYHbFeVaHbnQP5BNi8hdX8thFi/xFvkuKugWHr1MFiQiwLY/fXSqgdEg4 ZTKcffN25RbyJ6DNXtiTcxcMfosUu/5HuHlR/u/dlOTlJO3WJT5ZQNgQJLU3N8PREAuf fA1c31raLq1sRTQj1sklO6plBRJwbRJVw+6Iy78fZGA6mVXfeGzWgjGpLdZlPwPEEIBT ReOtbe210kdEEFN4/JC/FzYGAV4KFgYfz/8MSbr6ezEN5uUBRBkJ9WZbv3ph7LTYUxk7 ONqw== Original-Received: by 10.236.115.138 with SMTP id e10mr16349318yhh.79.1343084438111; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from vulcan.local (c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.215.105.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id va9sm505805igb.17.2012.07.23.16.00.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 47908F42D513; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:00:36 -0500 (CDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (chad's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:45:23 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.160.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151829 Archived-At: >>>>> chad writes: >> When in a scratch buffer, if I enable flyspell-mode, I can type fast enough >> that Emacs can't insert the characters as quickly as I can type. > I have written a few hundred thousand words of flyspell'd english text in > the ns port, primarily in text-mode and org-mode. Flyspell isn't fast, due > to a known annoyance with the ns port event loop, but it is certainly not > unusable for me (and for many others here), using relatively modern but not > top-of-the-line hardware. I would love to see if the mac port's approach > could improve this; it is far and away the most exciting potential of the > mac port (to me). > Do you still have this problem with flyspell if you run emacs -Q? Yes, I can confirm that it happens with -Q. John