From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com>
Subject: Re: Some projects
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:17:52 -1000
Message-ID: <m2io5uzor3.fsf@tsdye.com>
References: <87wpub9jts.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <m2mvv6zv8q.fsf@tsdye.com>
	<CAFgFV9OoBBaJwJYrdcm__8DFe0=Z8ODyCDBDsbMtJUv09Wtdjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oafmbyw1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <m2k2qazqsb.fsf@tsdye.com>
	<87fv0ybtwp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34449)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1ZqRkA-0000mh-Re
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:18:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1ZqRk5-0001gW-SL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:18:18 -0400
Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.25.95]:55716)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>)
	id 1ZqRk5-0001fk-Kv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:18:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <87fv0ybtwp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@supelec.fr>, Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, fabrice.popineau@centralesupelec.fr


Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>
>>> The full proposal was at
>>> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/97468> but it didn't get
>>> much positive feedback. Therefore I suggested a simplified version, with
>>> a single author.
>>
>> In my case, the lack of positive feedback was "too much org, too little
>> time".
>>
>> The original version, which includes the author Fabrice mentioned, seems
>> superior to me.  It potentially eases collaboration and also configuring
>> alternate versions of the same document.
>>
>> I'm not clear about affiliated keyword for source code blocks.  Would
>> tangling honor  #+OPTIONS:  <at> :student1?
>
> The limitation is that you can only replace the code block as a whole,
> so with
>
>   #+annotate: bugfix
>   #+name: bikeshed
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (paint 'bikeshed blue)
>   #+end_src
>
>   * Annotations
>
>   [@:bugfig:me]
>   # You're clearly wrong
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (pain 'bikeshed green)
>   #+end_src
>
> when using
>
>   #+OPTIONS: @:me
>
> body becomes
>
>   #+name: bikeshed
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (paint 'bikeshed green)
>   #+end_src

And also,

#+name: baz
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :noweb yes
(some code)
<<bikeshed>>
(other code)
#+end_src

so the various :noweb options, including evaluation of baz in the Org
mode buffer, honor #+OPTIONS: @:me?

All the best,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com