Re: Proposed new core library: pl.el

[John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>]

>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> Artur, since there have been no further comments, maybe it would help if I
> explained why I'm not convinced: because parsing libraries tend to be very
> performance-sensitive and could take advantage of the core in ways that most
> other libraries don't. They are also rare, so it makes sense to treat them
> with special care instead of as just another library.

Ted, what if pl.el is one of those "EPLA packages bundled with the tarball",
the way that seq.el is?

John