From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:50:37 -0800 Message-ID: References: <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com> <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ins2jq88.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg2p8swx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831sypjmst.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478458294 21723 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2016 18:51:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:51:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 06 19:51:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3SXK-00044k-Pk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:51:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46351 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3SXN-0001YD-Gv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:51:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3SWj-0001Y2-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3SWj-0005kD-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]:36138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3SWe-0005dV-GU; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:50:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id n85so13948231pfi.3; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:50:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=ke5pj+f0N2NVwCY4l7xu8PPA8yJY2sLuggRTySl5pYs=; b=tA/xbX7n88dsX/b0XhUd/Wuq8B3f2hAg2JgppmbP0D5C0HJeyyFh6lcs+ZGCTzV6wm AawzH1G2aOsdv3iLsCxR3icZI7qpUjhFBM0UFuN2L/C1ZTvPlKuJZyoYy7y5Esq0S00H T0Fhp4aIlfyXfPTcqcuWgoNvaw3D0eCJ/SyBvBq0mncknWYFkAL74KlLFbVUhy3iyBXv LbZAq1vdGXF6UxcTY6VhX+2l65ChYto4rIDVZM85yTksDonS8YuHT4e08kBhuJJ8ROPu ymV/IRMzRYJWAiLpak0Lj5rAzNsoBXPlOrILIvEKNnNrWO8aR/Ri6ds3yJO/SuhCBNkg gsSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=ke5pj+f0N2NVwCY4l7xu8PPA8yJY2sLuggRTySl5pYs=; b=RYwGiHxSxImdzMEojSHW4fffAqHQQizoc/S1EOpKI08XSeOlBCEuvG1rvfOx6H1PxV 4f50pC1iw8DKsXTUb+/r5skVc/J2DMg5tzO7gFqCGJWytcIWASZ/m+wmcDEiBJy8Q/Bg TS+QurjZtnc4JtM9e7xVfnacYn/nkzdXOoceUrrSxJfenCww7ZprScN/7ItqMNNKTtnv 2NP4XDOyNiXbmF287wc3TQyQIjwYFQ1g8HMp1PIxO2kJnY2HvEclzru3kMMvTHpOolYF HWluTPNs5o9dsYvbXoUrKwnIVgqYO1NixftcNUfoHlxFcoJs9d/DyZOUbX/GtEGK2z5D KQoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvegdKGNUpVHISF5o6hcTIJjkt3cvoMl0+qWF9PEuYq0Iyjq8Me0IKniqZ1UOOQoSg== X-Received: by 10.99.204.5 with SMTP id x5mr5120406pgf.96.1478458239094; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:50:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id zf9sm10521032pac.12.2016.11.06.10.50.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:50:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 297CD373E8E2; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:50:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:48:12 +0200") Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209222 Archived-At: >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: EZ> In any case, the non-removal of support for Windows 9X was an explicit EZ> request from Richard, an opinion which AFAIU he still held 5 years ago: Richard, do you still maintain this position? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2