From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prestowk Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL: mbox code status ? Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:21:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <873blcyopd.fsf@totoz.gnu-rox.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133532885 6821 80.91.229.2 (2 Dec 2005 14:14:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 02 15:14:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiBdu-0003hM-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:12:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiBdt-0001Mp-7Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:12:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EiAIQ-0001P4-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:45:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EiAGG-0000nF-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiAGF-0000n0-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EiAGF-0006HU-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EiADk-0003Pv-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:41:00 +0100 Original-Received: from gymdxii.dsl.saunalahti.fi ([85.77.17.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:41:00 +0100 Original-Received: from prestowk by gymdxii.dsl.saunalahti.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:41:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 6 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gymdxii.dsl.saunalahti.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NbzyxtgHTVrcKdsxlXYlnpWLz08= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46881 Archived-At: What are the main reasons for switching from Babyl to mbox format in Rmail? Are there technical or conceptual problems with the Babyl format, or is it just a case of wanting compatibility with a more widely used format? p.