From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unicode font-backend + tiling Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:32:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87ejrffa4k.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87mz62uc96.fsf@frontier.dottedmag.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165412038 10269 80.91.229.10 (6 Dec 2006 13:33:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 06 14:33:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GrwuB-0001ra-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:33:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrwuB-0001xG-5j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GrwtW-0001kf-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GrwtU-0001jw-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrwtU-0001jr-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GrwtU-0007QE-03 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GrwtL-00061f-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:32:55 +0100 Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:32:55 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:32:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEUCAgBACgkrLClyEhG/ IR5VV1R7fXqFh4SNj4yam5ilp6SytLHCxMHKzMnY2tf9//vsY4CiAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlw SFlzAAAuIQAALiEBB1v8/wAAAAd0SU1FB9YLFgIVH7MoU08AAAHvSURBVDjLXZS9TgJBEMeHj9PC qBB4gIuJrWLYB8CwD2BM0E5otLW2ggcw0craylZjYYsvQHwBBRqt1EtINGqOW2dmP49pbmd/7Hzx 3wVl7WY/3tg8dy6Y728MbNEwD97AWvEiBD/grTj0IIsDAJEHd+jWZbvZlHIHl1sWUKCSJGtXRQOd iQEDXJcZyFZ5F51VDf7Ag6ZsU/6EwZSAaEpj5G0z4JJEpVCpMaAkSwS+uUbZgqrQach9QjDVQAoT alfHArVngDXKDisKMuxBiJbwhOei4AcKFLjgQYXIBGbcAmYUOXAKUwZtNxUDtuFSN73jK6jReg32 jN9wc6nTeoVAXZozZZumAcuAAynYzmwWXC5xd3VpZ+tABAt92+4NKC0Ad8IFM9ZCwP/G0X2eNDA5 AxSQyKXAcnsM1GMYjRu8JNBH8foKaAjrMD04OYlXtYhqwu7jEGenSn0VUWL6v48rusw+/KKGVA/1 oh46Z1eHxx2t4wQUgSxxF0ZrIEIxPKm8gRGD+vR738NblTHoIkg9eIV1rWTUO/YWxEoTXRxLNIyF dg0XWXbLICwJN6KEd+jiTIL9L9znGATmwZFB14Tgy+mzpJhWV6Ovsy8Mf/wePABpkMYENk9G6s7M J/lHJh3p7yhZeH2Ueh69jD/Gzv0H5wIyh8Q+en4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EOuOPWNX/3TAecVUJROc+8FvEWk= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63355 Archived-At: On WED, 6 DEC 2006, Kenichi Handa wrote: [...] >> > >> > Chinese characters are dispalyed without antialias. >> > > >> This is awesome. > > What is awesome? The procedure to make Chinese character > displayed without antialias? Or, the looking of Chinese > character displayed withtout antialias by the above font? > If it's the latter, I agree. At least that font is better > with antialias. I use NSimSun and with your change, it is much readable without AA. > > --- > Kenichi Handa > handa@m17n.org -- Leo