From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#381: bug#831: 23.0.60; error in nsfonts.m Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:29:37 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <9oljyep93x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Ted Zlatanov , 381@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220871653 19046 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2008 11:00:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 381@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 08 13:01:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KceUx-0006AL-Q1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:01:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KceTt-0004OS-Me for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KceHV-0001xm-AR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:47:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KceHR-0001wf-TW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40173 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KceHR-0001wb-OL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:48208) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KceHR-0006vY-2C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m88AlWJh006388; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:47:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m88AZ4E0001691; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:35:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:35:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 381 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 381-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B381.122086978432316 (code B ref 381); Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:35:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 381) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Sep 2008 10:29:44 +0000 Original-Received: from mail.blockstar.com (ip114.208-100-47.static.steadfast.net [208.100.47.114]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m88ATebF032310 for <381@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:29:42 -0700 Original-Received: from mungo (c-68-60-254-123.hsd1.il.comcast.net [68.60.254.123]) by mail.blockstar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C633F86B1; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:29:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (darwin) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:47:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20341 Archived-At: On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:14 -0400 Glenn Morris wrote: GM> Would you mind not using the newsgroup interface? It seems to break GM> the bug tracker, in that your posts don't appear there (I have GM> forwarded some there). This is some bug, not your fault. I'll try to CC correctly. I have to use that interface, unfortunately. GM> Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I used the data member rename patch Austin and others suggested for two >> days now without problems. It lets Emacs build on Mac OS X and despite >> being insufficient as a full fix, at least the users don't have to wait >> for the full fix to have a working compile. >> >> I comitted this change to the Emacs CVS HEAD, including fixing the >> references to gidx in the xdisp.c docs, and will back it out (or anyone >> else can back it out) if it's a problem. GM> Can you give it the correct attribution in the ChangeLog? Maybe you GM> came up with it independently, in which case it's correct as is. GM> I thought it was Daniel Koning's. There were 2 suggestions plus I looked at it myself (with a `grep gidx'). I'll gladly attribute it to Daniel but Austin has a claim to it as well, and I don't know how to do mulitple authors. >> I apologize in advance if that's the case. All the gidx references >> are changed to cmp_from, that's all it does. GM> I left it alone partly because obviously wrong is better than subtly wrong. GM> (Not that I can say if it is right or wrong). I figured wrong is OK, broken is not OK for most Emacs users. Testing it for 2 days gave me confidence it would not be annoying. GM> And also partly to see how many duplicate reports were received. :) GM> About 13 I think, none apart from the first and the one with the patch GM> conveying any useful information. And most saying "is this known?" :) GM> (I'm not saying you should take it out.) OK. Kenichi Handa thinks it's a lot of work to make it work correctly with composition, so I think this should be documented as a TODO item. I don't know the right place to document this; it's not FOR-RELEASE since it probably won't block a release. Thanks for all your help with this and other issues. Ted