From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14574: prog-prettify-symbols breaks font-locking Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:09 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <8338sjusds.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371381971 16394 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2013 11:26:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:26:11 +0000 (UTC) To: 14574@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 13:26:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB60-0006mh-AT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:26:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5z-00016i-TF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5v-00016S-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5u-0008FZ-FT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5u-0008FU-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5u-00037a-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.137138193311923 (code B ref -1); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2013 11:25:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5Q-00036F-1B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42963) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5M-00035h-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5G-0008BZ-Df for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:23 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5G-0008BS-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5F-00015F-96 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5E-0008B3-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5D-0008Ax-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:25:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoB5D-0005f8-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:25:19 +0200 Original-Received: from 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net ([79.161.196.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:25:19 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:25:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0pV+4xMvRgEzkq8s5igT72XFqHw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75209 Archived-At: On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:11:20 +0200 Juanma Barranquero wrote: JB> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Or should it be lower level, where font-lock mode remembers "prettify" >> compositions as a text property? That would work regardless of >> `prog-prettify-symbols-alist' and would not require an unload hook. It >> would also work if we add prettification in other modes, not just >> `prog-mode'. JB> Yes, that's better IMHO. In fact, I like Dmitry's suggestion: >> Maybe we should make a font-lock-specific alias for `composition', like >> `font-lock-face' is for `face', and use that. JB> Seems the saner alternative if we are piggybacking into font-lock to JB> do composition... OK. Unfortunately I don't know font-lock well at all, so I would appreciate it if someone else could implement this. Ted