Re: Nextstep build uses iso-latin by default. WHY?

[John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> There's no point in Emacs coming with two different macosx ports, so
> incorporating Yamamoto Mitsuharu's version into Emacs would mean dropping
> the current "ns port" and that comes with various downsides as well.

A major point in favor of switching to Mitsuharu's version would be that he
actively maintains it, whereas our only active NS port maintainer recently
stepped down.

I wouldn't even mind there being two build flavors, if each were actively
maintained; but barring that, I'd prefer something that comes with a
maintainer.

It used to be the case in 24.x that the NS port was unusable in some ways
(poor sub-process communication made working with GDB untenable, for example),
and as such, Mac Port was something of a necessity. But the 25.x code seems to
have resolved that, so now I don't notice as much difference between the two.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 629 bytes --]