From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add facility to collect stderr of async subprocess Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:22:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2yfx8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <83egomxog1.fsf@gnu.org> <83ego5tjgt.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftno4fr.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <55247A98.5020302@cs.ucla.edu> <83r3rvgn4e.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftja89d.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87wphnwh2q.fsf@gmail.com> <83zimjl1zp.fsf@gnu.org> <83vax7l00s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475684580 22958 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:23:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 18:22:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1broxo-0003CM-NY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:22:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50201 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1broxn-0000Oa-85 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:22:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1broxe-0000Ma-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1broxc-00039O-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]:35538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1broxY-00038R-0M; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x234.google.com with SMTP id ik13so33710035pac.2; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=sOYVI+deSxAabLZgO73hd0vevAgm4H17gsYcVQ9EfDQ=; b=TovnnO43L8Kk0TYZV4g/j/5b+qMfD/4WIyn+3Ne8A3Y+Mv7sb89mgw1UhZiTqqxtxh LhRHyE/nMO6p/xGTnpB3aNBGzzxiwvq+udqfEMNvcpGVC4mMj1NQfRbN8A9go5+jLRSh tUg9lJgfRSOKiwxFmZcRO1nsK3lxP0VLncICZefxS8IGKjSnT2/rEmcdus9bklNYXBhi Ms5Lpgf6AOTzxsRqWJVoaMeFEFO00r0Nf/hLRGI+ZrR8qYL9DGydbfptv8gG7+vNAIaa 7af6d7QMGntdeOtYw8s2wXA3JX8pFRRQOebdspixnB4NnQQi8B2gXfrKl3xHDIUwomSu KXUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=sOYVI+deSxAabLZgO73hd0vevAgm4H17gsYcVQ9EfDQ=; b=PP/72CvaTA0reF4cavZNzYZw669wFjI4uRe9Nl0l7hK7tQnx+rQJbpm4e0z2bZuU3N Ai423KUc1GCuU1wJGNg6yeISqMUXakqotolaqhNpE/6l7EocBDEwTSdWyjG6E8qpkeF0 mWKt4N+eZlC8CYkLB1kVvE/3/RqhiYfk+jb7Qa2krfl5dndrq1eRFGPIC8LwmXr3OQp/ LD+5jXNzAuX4RD02pMDbK2Aoa5swu6POnrG1Qhfe2Ilk4+FHIhNy1OfHFVrFOMcksEVp vEtfhDLvYDZmb8QvXb/3ExV4XBB4FKa0COzFzsB3/5BoaqNnSbqNhwPX8hoi04Iubo5l U7Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rl8LvLzDWLE3Ut5+TJN8x8+jWDp62DhN0z9iQxEga1ZrJLtOq6w+ZRVERipguYdOg== X-Received: by 10.66.191.36 with SMTP id gv4mr14228346pac.209.1475684539261; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm64725030pfg.34.2016.10.05.09.22.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:22:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id A831E2A582F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:22:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83vax7l00s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:37:07 +0300") Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Tino Calancha , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208013 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "EZ" =3D=3D Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > What advantages do you see to adding this convenience feature, when > >> make-process already provides it? Again, some people may be familiar with >> (buf-out . buf-err) idiom from `call-process', and they may be reluctant= to >> use functions using keyword arguments. Not my case, though. EZ> Does anyone else have an opinion on this proposal? Since we have `make-process' for cases like this, I don't see a need to ext= end `call-process'. I'd rather we made changes like this either because (a) lots of people want it or (b) it's blocking someone from doing something -- and = not purely from a desire for consistency. I see such changes as wholly unnecess= ary at this time. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJX9Si2AAoJEMFE2PTxn+YwFjwL/igO3EQfKo+Qm62eDri/1Hy6 wOUngCiG+tw0pyYKPWCsdSgxOW6pOmNRtkrtAfyPBm7J+SEZcT/vuAYZLRYfNgc6 mItDDGhgg+/oYZOsfKEHcEotIy7/MXaeik86Rd99REiCgdwtePz4hC+nHrPj1rCh HgLCF3hh3Z8WDJw+QRF08QIsMM0YFrgeyYiPuTr+8qKCBELNIy3Q9Fpm00u5sGSn WKA5sDklqF6/CGPH/OWql5AYLrWNL5rRmbhtscKpV9FsYog/S4JCilOEWjwfdALU HHd64+9aAa8QldNck5IMdUH4MAexi8S6lyZpAEfcVnwf1djJoT//SBUyXZVgbNrr LY6qtsXrN9Au5IVTQa5h8iZxQlaMVLN/D0d0OQJknfX2ft3LtsL+sBGv//ffZqGU S6b5OFrJUXtufktiKRH/6ClCmsDZbEr67IeBnSyc2ZLxLU3htmO6bZUKsSQJy+uM VqyerL7IdCNK4Os0XzKxFWp5Lj6/UfHMLiyzOmc5KQ== =eFp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--