>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > What advantages do you see to adding this convenience feature, when > >> make-process already provides it? Again, some people may be familiar with >> (buf-out . buf-err) idiom from `call-process', and they may be reluctant to >> use functions using keyword arguments. Not my case, though. EZ> Does anyone else have an opinion on this proposal? Since we have `make-process' for cases like this, I don't see a need to extend `call-process'. I'd rather we made changes like this either because (a) lots of people want it or (b) it's blocking someone from doing something -- and not purely from a desire for consistency. I see such changes as wholly unnecessary at this time. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2