From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnus IMAP searching not working. Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:02:56 -0800 Message-ID: References: <86mxchrtgu.fsf@chateau.d.if> <81y5w1m66i.fsf@gmail.com> <86sjm9nkb6.fsf@chateau.d.if> <87ehxsrv9c.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bostpctj.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320470425 19513 80.91.229.12 (5 Nov 2011 05:20:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 05:20:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 05 06:20:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMYfy-0003jp-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:20:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47659 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMYfx-0007SV-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMYft-0007SF-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMYfs-00004z-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMYfs-0008WI-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMYfo-0003hg-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:20:08 +0100 Original-Received: from 129-134-58-66.gci.net ([66.58.134.129]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:20:08 +0100 Original-Received: from dave by 129-134-58-66.gci.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:20:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 129-134-58-66.gci.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PwcokDKEXL9KJgGRUf+olf5Dffw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145879 Archived-At: on Thu Nov 03 2011, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > It's done the way you suggested. I mean that I didn't just do that, but > also removed > > (defvar gnus-registry-enabled) > > in all the files that include gnus-registry.el, which your original > patch included. Please look at the Gnus Git repo to catch up with the > changes I've made; the Emacs trunk is always a little behind because > it's manually synchronized. We're OK now, though, honestly :) Thanks; I'm following Gnus' trunk, not Emacs', FWIW. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com