From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10984: 24.0.94; ediff-inferior-compare-regions doesn't seem to work properly Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:13:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331352875 20646 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2012 04:14:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10984@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 10 05:14:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6DhP-00074H-Qr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 05:14:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38186 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6DhP-0006LP-4P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:14:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6DhM-0006Ko-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:14:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6DhK-0001Y3-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:14:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6DhJ-0001Xt-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:14:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6E9y-0004hc-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dave Abrahams Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10984 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10984-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10984.133135459518013 (code B ref 10984); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10984) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2012 04:43:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6E9C-0004gT-Jc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:50039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6E99-0004gL-CJ for 10984@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:43:13 -0500 Original-Received: by vcbfk13 with SMTP id fk13so2183320vcb.3 for <10984@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:13:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=z79czkQui/cOO95GKzZjQoig9CoNAZl5h0ccBL48OJU=; b=b6NHMNV0rOm6T2zGI5/gGz7dbVrHiKOLHJjI0r7zUQKhgLweC9Vb+lto474chI+6Bc P81S/tWoWjiXPwTna4HRNlfcnNMq16BgfjqKa+Fvy7XmnPjVJ2DBxiAyNL9Q/pjmS7Rs 4Y5jri12fP6jtJ1nECenPMmAwhpr/BDnSOjKNkkQK/Rd/CbFHdYBslft1w964ooewIwX 82KH7GdGT5j8YkleUHZRdFyE9zr0POeS6fcyMLa+RFYb1cd8oO7p3H0mNfS3cD3lLdJY nSxJ8pWWCMp3LCFJvJmTyiG2GbpuFaY4ESLcazGbXrGJyEhQbFgbZW6QldVBVG1PiDLC lS4g== Original-Received: by 10.52.240.144 with SMTP id wa16mr7562376vdc.94.1331352813737; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:13:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from pluto.local (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com. [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm14739600vdk.0.2012.03.09.20.13.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:13:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by pluto.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 445022B69DD1; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:13:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:46:33 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.94 (darwin) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmZZfgPCTu3I62qNzyDentuM5raebvHrUz40RFyDyPyfAnzz2Bv726vb4I3OBEoZOsf1DXk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57620 Archived-At: on Fri Mar 09 2012, Glenn Morris wrote: > Dave Abrahams wrote: > >>> I doubt it has any relevance to the issue you report, but the above text >>> does not make sense. You might like to report it to the maintainer of >>> your Emacs. >> >> Yeah, it's not really relevant. I see the same problem with the stock >> NS build of Emacs; I was just using the Mitsuharu's Mac port when I got >> around to reporting it. > > Sorry, I didn't mean report the ediff issue, I meant report that the > (modified) boilerplate bug text in your version doesn't make sense; > > The report will be sent to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org: > > Please make sure that the bug is specific to the Mac port. > > Other bugs should be sent to the place you are guided with > M-x report-emacs-bug on some official ports such as X11 or NS. > > Presumably some other address than bug-gnu-emacs was supposed to appear > there. It did. I edited the text because I knew this bug should go upstream. Sorry for the confusion. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com