From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.tangents Subject: Re: Too few people taking care of bug reports, Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:06:37 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8337wdn6uu.fsf@gnu.org> <86611975jo.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> <838u65kxly.fsf@gnu.org> <86mvuk4xxd.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <831tbwlext.fsf@gnu.org> <5643A77D.90704@yandex.ru> <5643AD34.3000803@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447276019 21215 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 21:06:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stephen Leake , emacs-tangents@gnu.org, Richard Stallman , john@yates-sheets.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 22:06:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcbR-0007gu-9L for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:06:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcbR-0004Kt-9x for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcbP-0004Ko-Jm for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcbO-0002C2-PA for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:06:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]:34799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcbI-00028u-T0; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:06:41 -0500 Original-Received: by padhx2 with SMTP id hx2so41395557pad.1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:06:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=7U5TEXEyy0GgMIAzH8J97qdUrSJ4FMqG50lvQQAr7V4=; b=E84LA+x1zSA2xAelSJ2fqk5+zDA0bSVT4WHWhDPM1LNPiofg5EdLWzW8+9/ZjyJ4lK YPgppSQAvl2DklSJA+B/YFwrjC1BRu/Fyy8pXmioLRSx4Z2scalNR5iT5iRj3FuuqfT1 6SkoI1V2p7TGrh7866jqfGpsEHBOWUj/AwTV6Q11Nc6OfWxaoU4NEIt2d0CDr6HkTbu7 N5CSjt9hvXIbKljBGu1DQJLH9dCRcCzHPxAY+LoNhVVRBToPYxkP6oaIwgnqa3Pp7F3+ ENGUVDxRU1vEtFilvSQOZlD74TgOprtlv2RFJzwCY+yuey1HCzo5+Gf5deaoNWwDHqZy fMjg== X-Received: by 10.66.123.72 with SMTP id ly8mr17421645pab.92.1447275999683; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:06:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.attlocal.net (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cn4sm10939620pbc.94.2015.11.11.13.06.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:06:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.attlocal.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5448310560836; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:06:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5643AD34.3000803@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:03:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , Stephen Leake , emacs-tangents@gnu.org, john@yates-sheets.org, Richard Stallman X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-tangents@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.tangents:5 Archived-At: >>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > Still, though, the bug reports for ELPA packages that don't have any other > upstream are supposed to go into the Emacs bug tracker anyway. > It's not like upon moving a package to ELPA, we can immediately declare it > obsolete. Right? This is true. At least it will get a tag so that we know it's in ELPA. ELPA packages have the advantage of being able to deliver bug fixes post-release very easily. Anything that's in core has a much longer delay, and so is more important to fix sooner for that reason. John