From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: amd@gnu.org: eshell and external commands Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:23:23 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87zm11iqlv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186644360 21325 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2007 07:26:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 07:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 09 09:25:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IJ2P8-0004Eb-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:25:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ2P7-0006pl-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:25:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ1RM-0007aa-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ1RJ-0007a2-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ1RJ-0007Zx-Fl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fyodor.hcoop.net ([64.20.38.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJ1RF-0005iL-UB; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from 71-214-59-49.clsp.qwest.net ([71.214.59.49] helo=Hermes.localhost) by fyodor.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IJ1SY-0001zP-9E; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:25:26 -0400 Original-Received: by Hermes.localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id B754736C49D; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 00:23:23 -0600 (MDT) In-Reply-To: <87zm11iqlv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed\, 08 Aug 2007 18\:55\:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (darwin) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:25:55 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76246 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > The following patch fixes this. However, maybe it is too drastic > because it imposes the use of eshell-eval-command on *every* build-in > command. This is how Eshell used to behave. It's is a bit drastic, because eshell-eval-command is much, much slower than plain eval. I'm prefer to find a fix which preservers the faster behavior for all cases except those which break. John