From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bbdb.user Subject: Re: Adding BBDB 3 core to Emacs Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:16:22 -0800 Message-ID: References: <82mvuffcyc.fsf@jobim-via-gmail.com> <45822.7509.289752.22092@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <64270.20127.528598.22095@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448169612 13285 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2015 05:20:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 05:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: George McNinch , Roland Winkler , bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thomas Fitzsimmons Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 06:20:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0N4C-0000AA-Jk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:20:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0N4C-0004b8-99 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0N48-0004aq-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0N45-0000Da-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:19:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]:35573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0N45-0000DW-JK; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:19:53 -0500 Original-Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so157736368pac.2; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:19:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=ccdrakix8+I6mpCH6kvrNuh5ivchbSo9/so+mMcxl8U=; b=vVCFGvh66PL2AibBXjgQjnocz2EGzaVMXb/g6ZsrMhNmex3LnKwt62bwoKqXEvcWJ1 NqXVNHVRCZBn4tb/PGdbM5OEPdvKHqjUrZeuAAIFwUJynsdZ2zdtJSFOIkpRDcogSV35 UI98tiQ4AjgbqdRQPKbtRXZ6SY1EzXeA062tOHVZhRNHm0ALWmw37amIa1RMTkRWTjaG 7pyZRJJFP+4D6tkpICCjvrCiU63K8ajltveSDO0+kbBR3SyNWaXoszr/qGZUErJrjTgm 719Abfjt7vzlvhH+FxA2uofsWNinEJoybDdnvC48l9j3KWv0bz3+954GBY7tF4tyPDBj sWlw== X-Received: by 10.68.105.193 with SMTP id go1mr28513949pbb.129.1448169592984; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:19:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ux3sm5435295pac.18.2015.11.21.21.19.51 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:19:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4DC5310A6433E; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:19:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Thomas Fitzsimmons's message of "Sat, 21 Nov 2015 14:37:17 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Fitzsimmons , "Roland Winkler" , George McNinch , bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194981 gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:4113 Archived-At: >>>>> Thomas Fitzsimmons writes: > If Gnus, Org, EUDC move to "tarball ELPA" eventually, then BBDB could move > too. Yes, I would like to see that happen. > Or, the other argument is that BBDB could become part of the core "platform" > that provides contact management features to other Emacs packages. That > would probably imply that long-term BBDB should stay in core. That could be an argument for being in core, yes. > But in either case, short term (in Emacs feature roadmap timescales :-)) I > think it would make sense to put "BBDB core" in Emacs core. If other core packages depend on it, then yes, until those others move to ELPA, core would be the right place. John