From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-syntactic-keywords obsolet? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:26:29 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160619145934.GC5875@acm.fritz.box> <6bc7b3bc-ddb7-c041-9f68-f8b5faeca63b@yandex.ru> <20160619151836.GE5875@acm.fritz.box> <1d4c62e6-905b-4a51-28b8-e68169fb3269@yandex.ru> <20160619153455.GG5875@acm.fritz.box> <11c988f0-94c0-40dd-b9cd-5a5e27028b63@yandex.ru> <20160619171531.GH5875@acm.fritz.box> <751427e7-f305-7790-99f5-dea230d8e6c4@yandex.ru> <20160620105850.GB3166@acm.fritz.box> <23d7473e-50da-b6dc-17a7-1fec4aad6bfa@yandex.ru> <20160620152535.GB2192@acm.fritz.box> <076b7311-ad16-4913-b0ec-fc73ea4550a1@yandex.ru> <6e028101-2f0f-28c8-2762-14fa91087fcc@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466468828 14375 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 00:27:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Noam Postavsky To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 02:26:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bF9Wi-0006Ig-JD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 02:26:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF9Wh-0006td-QG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:26:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF9Wc-0006tX-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:26:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF9WW-0002rB-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:26:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]:36793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF9WV-0002r7-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:26:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t190so245999pfb.3 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=vDCx7Zqfia5oUplFeBFrtDWb/NfICFuVQ21et8aTjq0=; b=n8jbG0JaLw4oKjZzRP9VrJllXbnz9T5PC35xLR6M4boSK+T5ccGhHsbda/rcwN8g6w wqHZOa43uC40yTk254HTYBHIyFbsDobGrs+DSPtVPLRj4r5GS1NoQf93hIPTkkuyWIiK T/foFW8KM6Y4i49GX/uAQqu9+1e/5jcwveKfa5qJ6B1kjFW0uCi/X7qsOw3tVVka0Y46 0HIdQh7G8VHbj++d02ka3WhCN7moc8IJW4KjM5xHvGwzDPn0zHOeIqQFXzEVJx03PHzO ZExnp24lF+A78OQ0KchswMZUJn3laUrNNasl7ShqMqCwK/ZnLa/6V5hLyXsiaePB52QW +2Mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=vDCx7Zqfia5oUplFeBFrtDWb/NfICFuVQ21et8aTjq0=; b=gwAwU++1WsuF//rBB9V+mDmFrxR52rzts2fRdufjIJSl3J7EyYOYO1xn+qBPiVjTdK ufKk60gjKAPghlX4Nawpv6w19+6Ze+nrPsWbm+yWygM59k5TuHie+2V8nxpBE8GUr/V6 lppp/UJmmIs9UabpDfz6rrhB/1/j6/7dbZ02hkTmHYsPsUGKBuIVg5IK0v/zJVYwvpdf Qu46ozaOSuaExwtmNoE+t0MRtBot4ZpowzsWSBpRhOwHe2nSOQrnSbb+YZ5pSU3eO/wX h+j8Z31h25F2scwBZJk4x7x4A9d1S9O+Iy2nQtyan95yTzvDuI9esjKmEEimGgwPXuzY iOkA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKnJqbPccjzJTU6rND4HJywuYLfiy8YDkP8/JfVL0NryWJ92iZfZ7Woy8vElhPXJQ== X-Received: by 10.98.5.2 with SMTP id 2mr11390083pff.58.1466468795034; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm78582662pac.46.2016.06.20.17.26.32 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:26:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8F5BB9DF895; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:26:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6e028101-2f0f-28c8-2762-14fa91087fcc@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 21 Jun 2016 02:30:44 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.95 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Gutov , Alan Mackenzie , Noam Postavsky , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204623 Archived-At: >>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > I gave several explanations and examples. There is no way I can continue > doing that if the explanations are waved off with opinionated "bad design" > comments, and examples with "I've never had that kind of problem". > > Here's an example in Ruby: OK, I like this: a nice, concrete example of why we wouldn't want to do this. Alan, do you have any counter-examples that are as succinctly expressed? Maybe both sides have merit here, but the amount of dialog makes me wonder whether this isn't coming down to just differences of opinion. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2