From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Keith David Bershatsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cursors: Is superimposing the same glyph a feature? Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:28:49 -0800 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="15396"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Third ,Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 17:29:53 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2qd-0003qS-SR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:29:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57774 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2qc-00007k-KP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:29:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2px-00005c-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2pv-0006CU-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from gateway33.websitewelcome.com ([192.185.146.85]:25335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2pu-00063i-BJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:29:07 -0500 Original-Received: from cm14.websitewelcome.com (cm14.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.7]) by gateway33.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC43759A for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:28:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from gator3053.hostgator.com ([50.87.144.69]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id v2pegcqpd2qH7v2pegAEj2; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:28:50 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lawlist.com ; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xd+1rlycnwtIAnTWyweNxXLuX+DX6zQVsPOP1QF9A7w=; b=dvil3Ysn4ljPCMXEkWt9VBwhod 8zT3ZAFFTg6riLyZzMPHYqMmd0jgNg+67aaxpj299YQ1HB9MQ8leS/s6wXUkkLYLJYvHwVo2yyv3f BhB/PgX9rzfesGkRS0zusARfFkPZnZLqurOIoMNEZ92b8qfOohDkdEgkwHHAVUgw+IrK/c4UXO2kw cOHrK66iCFQJ/c0PNmgS75S8n7uy7mSangq/vSoozW1Fjwabuv4g+YcEkA8M0GIwqvt3W0tCQH4qW 2MVC693NFU7Lkm0skomsH+RCG3eP19/f3HBplNKCkBGbAQxXvQudxH5Jb+tMQ5dUSawoQ9RXERCNK ezaCYIUg==; Original-Received: from cpe-45-48-239-195.socal.res.rr.com ([45.48.239.195]:49319 helo=server.local) by gator3053.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2pd-000LP6-NW; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:28:49 -0600 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3053.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lawlist.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 45.48.239.195 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1gv2pd-000LP6-NW X-Source-Sender: cpe-45-48-239-195.socal.res.rr.com (server.local) [45.48.239.195]:49319 X-Source-Auth: lawlist X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: bGF3bGlzdDtsYXdsaXN0O2dhdG9yMzA1My5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t X-Local-Domain: yes X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 192.185.146.85 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233416 Archived-At: Thank you both. ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > Date: [02-16-2019 03:00:21] <16 Feb 2019 11:00:21 +0000> > From: Alan Third > To: Keith David Bershatsky > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Cursors: Is superimposing the same glyph a feature? > > * * * > > I can see it too. I'd never noticed. I doubt very much it's > intentional. > > It looks like the NS port does the wrong thing here. At the moment it > redraws the glyph on top of the cursor as long as CURSOR_TYPE != > NO_CURSOR, but looking at an X build, it looks as though HBAR_CURSOR, > for example, should cover the glyph. > > So I reckon we should only redraw the glyph if the cursor is filled box or > hollow box. > > Patch attached. > -- > Alan Third > > [* 0001-Prevent-redrawing-the-glyph-on-top-of-bar-cursors.patch]