From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs author stats Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:27:47 -0500 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <83wq12zqd9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429813690 8004 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2015 18:28:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:28:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 20:28:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLqz-00025Z-0g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:28:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41600 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLqy-0006lj-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLqu-0006if-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLqq-0005lW-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]:35415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLqq-0005lR-BE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: by iejt8 with SMTP id t8so67350621iej.2 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:27:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hFVN3er6/IOjqe1RPrukP7+Lvc5ofP1almInUTyOyQo=; b=zrZ+5RDV219wl5DQTNsRDjgsT/ccwJKZGinRvt5NdvrRkmPcmxnoFrWpQ2XnZIAMfj Oo1Fv5tbAnnSsFxL7F5wakFMNWWhe3klTe2xrd1GuIi7WPUxrLJd1yHdW3GXieJECImO aFh+ABc246/DvnTId11rAJG3kNToaFbfQbxl142zG530qc/a8XlE15fx6GHLa9t0Ebzo uIDdQWaUa1pkyloDYE2vRl3TNtYpufoeSYONqs9c1y11KyDxtUIe7rBUKR0KnBlIYnRB JPCkOSCEVA2WcFIwU4/jkDaxzexQO+S0ErbRpsR5vRHpZv0FNg14kN5kCId3oUSMkojN W/aA== X-Received: by 10.107.135.144 with SMTP id r16mr463812ioi.13.1429813671669; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (c-98-214-120-98.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.214.120.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d10sm10827igo.0.2015.04.23.11.27.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D03AE9664C88; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:27:49 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <83wq12zqd9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:49:54 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185831 Archived-At: > "Uhm=E2=80=A6 Well, attracting droves of new developers didn=E2=80=99t ha= ppen, apparently. > Except for the spike the month git was introduced, we=E2=80=99re within t= he normal > range of developers, I think. >=20 > So=E2=80=A6 was the changeover worth it? Probably. But the impact was a b= it over-sold > on both sides, I think." You really need to wait a bit more before making judgments on whether it was worthwhile or not. People are still getting used to the change, and many people haven't even heard of it (I hadn't until a few weeks ago!). John