From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comment-add Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:27:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ir5zwu4j.fsf@escher.local.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190759494 15648 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2007 22:31:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 00:31:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IaIwC-0006d2-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:31:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaIw9-0002pn-Mm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaIw5-0002p2-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaIw3-0002oq-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:31:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaIw3-0002on-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.134]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IaIvy-0005iI-T1; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:31:15 -0400 X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]:53171 helo=localhost.localdomain) by ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.154]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1IaIvs-0004EL-FU (Exim 4.63) (return-path ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:31:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:57:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 Emacs/23.0.50 (20070922) Fedora 7 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79871 Archived-At: On 2007-09-25 18:57 +0100, Richard Stallman wrote: > In case anyone's tallying votes on this, I am in favor of making the > default comment-style `indent'. > > I am not deciding by votes between these two choices. I also found 'indent the best choice. Actually I was very annoyed by the default behavior when I was trying to comment out part of an XML file. -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :. Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/