From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:02:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9r8egen.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5t6gex.fsf@gnu.org> <555E09AE.9070208@cs.ucla.edu> <83lhgh6fb2.fsf@gnu.org> <555E2C10.4010501@cs.ucla.edu> <83h9r5670s.fsf@gnu.org> <555E6A15.8010404@cs.ucla.edu> <831ti957wp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5s4uml.fsf@gnu.org> <555F740D.4030304@cs.ucla.edu> <837fs04egz.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalco1mg.fsf@igel.home> <83y4kg2yjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq002yct.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6oo0h3.fsf@igel.home> <83vbfk2x9l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnhcnym6.fsf@igel.home> <83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432368217 4966 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 08:03:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 08:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 10:03:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4P1-0003WI-GS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:03:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37048 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4P0-0000ia-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4Ok-0000iF-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4Og-0005fA-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:46791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4Oc-0005e1-2J; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ltxxw5Jq4z3hhbQ; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:03:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ltxxw1Tx4zvh2K; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:03:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TyLjKFezns8; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:02:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: oD0B6N3FmoMz07ClmdhA4zYEBppa3Neuz0SHdBt84LAJS/B1vYdGcPK3u3g/Wroc Original-Received: from linux.local (ppp-93-104-184-121.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.184.121]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:02:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 625351E5889; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:02:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: FOOLED you! Absorb EGO SHATTERING impulse rays, polyester poltroon!! In-Reply-To: <83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 23 May 2015 09:39:00 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186754 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > This seems to say that such byte offsets are the only "right" ones. Right. > But we have just established that all of the byte offsets discussed > here, including the ones currently produced by etags, are wrong in ??? etags _does_ produce byte offsets, currently. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."