From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: behaviour change in cl-subseq Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:48:59 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87pp32orsy.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87zj242224.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438854611 26490 80.91.229.3 (6 Aug 2015 09:50:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:50:11 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 06 11:50:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNHoC-0006hE-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:49:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNHoB-0003yc-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNHo7-0003yV-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNHo4-0000hT-Mc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNHo4-0000hK-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:49:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNHnl-0006Ir-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:49:29 +0200 Original-Received: from 116.213.171.4 ([116.213.171.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:49:29 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 116.213.171.4 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:49:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 116.213.171.4 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (OS X 10.10.4) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ddyVfHEhgA1NPZ8HXwI6mZdSLMk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188488 Archived-At: On 2015-08-06 17:34 +0800, Phillip Lord wrote: > Fortunately, Tassilo has answered this; I've never used CL. I answered it in a hurry before going to work :( > I agree that this change is entirely justifiable. I'm generally not a > huge fan of silently ignoring inaccurate arguments. If you are happy > with the changed interface, then I have no major problem, although it > may break packages besides mine. The old behaviour was odd and inconsistent (try it on []). > Do you mind if I patch the docstrings, though? Not at all. Leo