Suvayu Ali writes: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> Suvayu Ali writes: >> >> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:54:24AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks - makes perfect sense. My only question is the contrib >> >> directory. I assume I simply also have to copy the files in the same >> >> version specific lisp dir? >> > >> > Add something like this to local.mk (if non-existent, create one) >> > >> > ORG_ADD_CONTRIB = org-notmuch ox-groff ox-koma-letter >> >> Thanks - haven't looked at that file yet. So than the specified files >> would be compiled and put in the contrib directory or copied in the lisp directory? > > Yes, see the documentation on worg for details. > > http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-build-system.html#sec-4-1-2 > >> Ok - so the sequence : >> >> make clean > > When running uncompiled, this might not be needed; not sure. > >> make autoloads >> make doc >> make info > > If you do `make doc', the above is redundant. See the build system page > I linked above. > >> would build all needed files incl documentation? > > Yes. AFAIU, building pdf docs, or info pages have no connection with > compiling Org. > >> Would compiling have any advantages over un-compiled, besides of speed? > > Not that I know of. In fact, it would be easier to debug in case you > hit bugs. Given that you follow master, that's probably not uncommon. > >> But as org-mode does not do any exorbitant calculations, I would assume >> that the only workflows where the speed issue comes in is tangling and >> publishing and org-lint? > > I don't know. Nicolas, and maybe Rasmus are better equipped to answer > these questions. You might want to ask on the Org list. OK - thanks a lot for all your valuable info - I will use org uncompiled then and see how it goes, Cheers, Rainer > > Cheers, -- Rainer M. Krug email: Rainerkrugsde PGP: 0x0F52F982