From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Request] seq-map and mapcar with arbitrary number of sequences Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:10:46 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <87si5ifvvk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444507984 13821 80.91.229.3 (10 Oct 2015 20:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 10 22:13:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zl0Vq-0000SX-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:13:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zl0Vp-0006jZ-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zl0Tq-0003zY-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zl0To-0008RH-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:10:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]:35013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zl0To-0008R8-Aa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: by pabve7 with SMTP id ve7so59093894pab.2 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:10:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=uTpajYI9G9DxN8tON9fEU1RddpbGjRCgmZ+kubzCFFM=; b=NfAreqWagW6UESjUM9jsL972GLEHIqj3pnmh4nOeXwlyvUyXiD42wKYK36W1W7g2rE x7mJ6xY9PJkM+D7d5qOuzZc44YwtT6pTXozm5Sfa57Tx8oVH3v6YPE/jm3Nj7BkcUpV7 i7/92WFat+2odolIxMft+HbBvsgfvvTXU7+fCAO5bdwQfH+fhMyWCVJ7eei6oxeKLoGP MxwHie1UBEKlfqf5twn2mGZTwg3pT7jfIhJZUGEnTr02of8WKrGmVoVENmtV/FJIwbkL Why+e279GCOu0b2pan+DJTyLqI4qbZa1WwQR84UeilZ1TEhNjgBnsdULwv28kNAJ3rH6 Uj2Q== X-Received: by 10.66.55.41 with SMTP id o9mr24457431pap.44.1444507855504; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rp5sm9780055pab.0.2015.10.10.13.10.52 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 53157F278D1D; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:10:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87si5ifvvk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:58:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191172 Archived-At: >>>>> David Kastrup writes: > The byte compiler should be able to squash the difference, right? If you can demonstrate that to me, I'm sold. As long as the C code doesn't change, and the increase in complexity vanishes at byte-compilation time, I have no argument. John