Re: Need review of emacs-25-merge branch

[John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>]

>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Frankly, I don't see how that would be needed, in the simple workflow we use
> around here.

You know, I think now you may be right, as much as I love technology. I just
did a plain "git merge emacs-25", in the same master branch as yesterday.

I was presented with the same 12 merge conflicts; it took all of 1 second to
perform that merge; and I would have had to resolve the same conflicts in the
same way I did when using git-imerge. Only, it would have proceeded in a
fraction of the time.

So, no actual win for git-imerge, I was just scared off by what Stefan wrote
that I didn't even try the standard method to compare.

I'll stick with gitmerge.el and just being more regular, until the complexity
becomes a real problem. The main thing now is ChangeLog-2. Paul, would you be
willing to help with that one this time?

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2