From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 f8208b6: Document the user-level features of the Xref package Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:28:18 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20160109191428.26341.44105@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <5691C9D2.7080905@yandex.ru> <83egdpmo1j.fsf@gnu.org> <56929D6F.2050508@yandex.ru> <834melmfa4.fsf@gnu.org> <5692B1E0.8010100@yandex.ru> <831t9pma4e.fsf@gnu.org> <5693FDFA.2070607@yandex.ru> <83ziwbkj5l.fsf@gnu.org> <5694055E.6050201@yandex.ru> <83si1udcaz.fsf@gnu.org> <569D64AC.1060606@yandex.ru> <83powxbh6c.fsf@gnu.org> <569EB04F.800@yandex.ru> <8337tsc133.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453275003 13649 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2016 07:30:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 20 08:29:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLnDG-0004oz-E5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:29:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLnDF-0002Ow-D7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 02:29:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLnCu-0002NX-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 02:29:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLnCt-0003mk-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 02:29:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]:35781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLnCq-0003mQ-Or; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 02:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 65so250638pff.2; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:29:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=JahJX9DUIFPMbGexxCNfOmYxiQPaEKRT5xFMqTv9Xxg=; b=Oekcs0VlFSRVXHupK1h8vsbqZvJdDVCrMra2dv7v4XU10DjFh/n4rNzl1YVn7u82dm +lJmeXIyXbQ4UlqV3BpuRi1z+heo8Aiy5DF5gC2T4wA7N4+9RNcIPGJuzVnoaqYbVSjY lwSkLkr789js4KmDz415C8nFBi7keIA4Z/usli06UVjWnr62kknrCGyUuM18h9uLE9kj ZzHc4XJkht+s+U5pCbhRXm/9/fFw2vmBDDR6DIKKE5rdsPrp2kHqVjhz/X3JUn1E6oEQ 9M10auTbJda3/5OZ9RqoJzu/GrA9yP+92VyDd09uzPitD7A1gTpov4b2jStQ898Hx97K cAKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-type; bh=JahJX9DUIFPMbGexxCNfOmYxiQPaEKRT5xFMqTv9Xxg=; b=jbflGbi5F9B0WRoCkqQqKKYj1ymBBDb1raJvhlk50NUgDGNntLQylVLKPqujvywP/k AejhQ6Vavo75z4AQaq5WgC8xyIHHdLVMGNUp7cUkhUMD/3PoAyoBGPI31pWiH3tk09d4 jvhyDW5uklwq8CFqC4ZSHwHjggFFtaeP/tsodQ4L8MRCX6KDc/Oj+WRSD3eSrum04IcF hIpvxqAYfxlNevn+UrrNZCbin94jWHGn3aXfHYoLATksNUH+tZdwIC9TrQZuJ/JNC2PN pAuB3L/0xGVSfH0n47SR3YYWi2x+W/bNDFcgADoqNV6LrbOZCBPpYa7nRjiD7+uzXBBR 3FVw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZMf3zKQIAqQl8Dn4bUCJvDov1nanTAqadykyMihC+0iIGqcKzudjadEsh+BoOTxl7q3pzjpBxIjIrttn4i5ImRwFPJA== X-Received: by 10.98.1.203 with SMTP id 194mr51273679pfb.10.1453274968107; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:29:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wm9sm40699405pab.25.2016.01.19.23.29.25 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:29:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E78F4124FE384; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:29:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8337tsc133.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Jan 2016 06:43:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198414 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > No, dired-do-find-regexp cannot replace it, because it looks through all the > files in the directory, whereas tags-search looks in the files recorded in > the tags tables. We should have an xref-based replacement for tags-search > and tags-query-replace, which would similarly search through the "relevant" > files. These are currently the only 2 etags-based commands in that section > that directly invoke etags.el. Once we solve that problem (and I think we > should do this before v25.1 is out), there will be no reason for splitting > the description more than it already is (the tags tables and how to build > them are already described in a separate subsection). Thanks, Eli, you wrote exactly what I had wanted to after reading that comment. Yes, and yes. > (Btw, I think replacing tags-search and tags-query-replace with commands > that start with "project-" is not a good idea, for the same reason that > having "tags-*" commands there is. They should be "xref-*" commands.) And yes. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2