From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Asynchronous DNS Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:56:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87si1gx6wz.fsf@gnus.org> <86y4b5zvzt.fsf@gmail.com> <8760y9kwrk.fsf@gnus.org> <8760y7nag7.fsf@gnus.org> <83oabzzsjq.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuxazkfe.fsf@gnus.org> <83io25yeqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9hpnreg.fsf@gnus.org> <83y4b0wi7m.fsf@gnu.org> <87si17evk6.fsf@gnus.org> <83twlnvcz2.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb63obm3.fsf@gnus.org> <87r3gqmg6g.fsf@gnus.org> <83egcqtfnm.fsf@gnu.org> <86mvrdmk8p.fsf@realize.ch> <83mvrcsefa.fsf@gnu.org> <871t8o556n.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454947539 5987 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 16:05:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Alain Schneble , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 17:05:38 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoJj-0000Ng-BU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:05:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46084 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoJi-0005gP-L7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:05:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoIZ-0003jX-3A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoIV-0006ui-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]:33455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoIL-0006oN-GH; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z13so88601707ykd.0; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:04:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=z3YC/Ois/OGgL12uTMhl/LtKCsYAAjI6GlZWOZJhprk=; b=f5nK/y6sa4ST69D5am0FbmymzwERAAPIiy2TXuPyPDoGUkQxiYAQTdEVymYmrNFIML uCNH+v1+yF/ZUkvotBg+wiQS+EEUPFuGl6ZH27TVF1x//1t6EiWchsTcoXF0NTIdZC6U yab3LEfuz41XbxiJ6AO4GvQQzQKLftn15eq4IdHT7s6ie+8kjjMmgOQ3NiaROePcfRLx 9xB5fYS2wada6KqXmFKSqzwJlLUR1297CqquaPN/glF1/3EO7Ca1aoFrReWznaNdzCMh jMCdtbO2ia7K3b1Nyc87lZ8EF8PW5WJDMNbejwt+5YZ5g9KRRgo/ghJY/pymJry+uPP/ m3kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-type; bh=z3YC/Ois/OGgL12uTMhl/LtKCsYAAjI6GlZWOZJhprk=; b=ZBz6eyJj1vNM0vdoqyBoIrQ8prOts5VYxJkeO2XwMj9M+uAidVLIRGDVy3cvAhFZTO FccnpEgzhtSyF6gm9/JLbPWzDCnsrN1q5C5tKwWHmejX1Mo4mBQ+VmfirrliUxa9kQpg dKqP5Mtsf9GSEsVbSmxQZGzKJVp5tMTAj4Nk1ZpFYxqJifuSeSjhyWpOBRKLs3UUHTif xxJn3VR/X57ChhsP2PN5WDImI+G2+f1fpSentSIZhaczFAfSo2iimQygcmuuHY3B5SRi hNoupcbYL5ROR5dC0kp3+oUY8KV3Gj2mZeOOz+IUa9d0OMLvxcR0ySZSfbGV5YreHwVA YznA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTTH8idD8ogDZgkHevzCHj2nw8/Pff7sRvHo0pZy8jtSoP/lK2beAOE34QScFKDYw== X-Received: by 10.37.95.84 with SMTP id t81mr15501328ybb.58.1454947449152; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:04:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Hermes.local (56.sub-70-214-64.myvzw.com. [70.214.64.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b126sm21306691ywd.3.2016.02.08.08.04.07 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:04:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Hermes.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B03684DDD3EE; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:04:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <871t8o556n.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:03:44 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii , Alain Schneble , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199526 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Ideally, when you're sending mail with smtpmail.el, it would all happen > without Emacs being blocked, right? So that the user can go on reading the > next email. In GNU ELPA, the async package uses async.el to make smtpmail easily asynchronous, without any changes to smtpmail.el. I mentioned async.el before in connection in improving asynchronicity in Gnus, but I don't think you responded. Would you mind giving me your comments as to its applicability -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2