From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?S=E9bastien?= Kirche Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ATSUI support on Carbon Emacs Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:11:24 +0200 Organization: Aucune. Message-ID: References: Reply-To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?S=E9bastien?= Kirche NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130548305 4825 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2005 01:11:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 03:11:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVfEs-0001SU-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:10:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVfEr-0004sS-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVfEi-0004sD-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVfEh-0004rk-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVfEh-0004rh-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EVfEh-0002Ze-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EVfDN-0001E0-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:08:57 +0200 Original-Received: from falbala.seki.fr ([81.56.248.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:08:57 +0200 Original-Received: from sebastien.kirche by falbala.seki.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:08:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: falbala.seki.fr X-Face: ; T}O6aj2o*d:|9po%NCuYvExN3]<#cHr0"FaWCh[}WVn6&@L)YWO'&6AO5Ex:MX=H; .^e}o Td*OaFQEBc_xu%+ChwRl!KK`I'["$^aO1gIN{4OyBdO@1HHD5YO#[kiVCk|/-|mmYnU8yTp+eOv."d 1.G3; ro0Q/`,UY+vY/#5b/{OYxE+X\)tc~p~1vbmZ!o4sciW+e8MW|Pz|nl`l*}]8[#1zQO"]d2*{d wrTKu]5t*Gy_pm3e8o=:(c_ju'zlQ<[oJ|\XjgQQmWZC7S]-Fmp\eBHnBO']/te~/; \@l" D#:h)8Q User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+f7Tt3hmANQkYYYYqvg4EknPJaQ= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45062 Archived-At: At 12:10 on oct 28 2005, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu said : > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:44:35 +0200, Sébastien Kirche > > > > > > said: > > > I am currently with the default monaco. > > > Plain text uses > > -apple-monaco-medium-r-normal--9-90-72-72-m-90-iso10646-1 > > while italic is > > -apple-monaco-medium-i-normal--9-90-72-72-m-90-iso10646-1 > > As far as I tested on Mac OS X 10.3.9, difference in width between > default and italic could only be observed with 9pt font (as for > Monaco). I don't think I can fix it in a non-ad hoc way. Oh, so it is actually not a problem because I was just using monaco-9pt as the default built-in font for testing Emacs "out of the box" with x86 + atsui support. Instead I usually set another "developer font" that provides fixed width chars and some details like dotted zeros to distinguish them from letter o. So indeed the problem with the width of italics disappeared after using a "defaults write" to set Emacs.font. One weird detail : I had to choose the mac-roman variant of that font instead of the iso10646-1 like the default monacco. With the iso10646, italics and others styles were ok except bold format that shown no glyphs at all (not even blank squares). So now my display is fine, appart the current atsui imperfections. But I find them worth to have some previously unavailable chars. Thanks. -- Sébastien Kirche