From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we not introduce frivolous indentation change to define-minor-mode? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:00:50 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83d1tg57p6.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuybqdby.fsf@gmail.com> <87lh82vq6t.fsf@gmail.com> <87d1tevmjb.fsf@gmail.com> <87io36k9be.fsf@bernoul.li> <8737uavhcu.fsf@gmail.com> <568D389D.60401@yandex.ru> <87si2au25w.fsf@gmail.com> <83bn8x2wxt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452193285 7110 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 19:01:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 20:01:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHFoA-0004sV-DC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 20:01:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60228 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHFo9-0001tu-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHFnw-0001tb-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:01:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHFns-0003k9-Fl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]:35719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHFns-0003k2-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x235.google.com with SMTP id ho8so4511331pac.2 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:00:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=lB8pGy+0oSqpukI3ezDqcYyoSLt/PqKgNhHKUxBneVs=; b=dWmVoEgI/RAznfSB0RT6I/3kCMTwqe61LV5j6lwwockAX8Xspt/lUjWTqTkQj443Vo 8QhaiqQCVbRZDLaGQE9LxwBsRqLXzvG9OQlYUVv04v8bfJ2S5DxOK09luvZLZRo+34p8 tYrGOEYYonYpR3evAoS1fq/Z74bVPlMFLU8AA/QobCkQdPLNv2UqJ4wrlzaHOJg01ll0 xFdAyfYHMGb2YAGqYVxsRHrl1RTVy+gyk1DLI9p4idxNlEAXIAEo3SVtPJcu509vq7SO FSFFV43PsvNMqcPuTnvc+AJRKFT/fpGwDkhxpyrEv9j7B8sdcUBcUPK/VfHSmcnYoUap lzMg== X-Received: by 10.67.6.195 with SMTP id cw3mr153942815pad.88.1452193255540; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:00:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fl9sm160830938pab.33.2016.01.07.11.00.54 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:00:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id F3390122335F7; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:00:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:49:34 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197749 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Leo Liu writes: > I have weighted on the comments provided and taken the action accordingly > based on the fact that it is an incompatible change and controversial on a > few points. Our main concern here is establishing a policy for the future that avoids t= he potential for negative reaction in these cases. On this particular commit, what you did might even be appreciated by the original author; but hearing them agree first would have been better. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJWjrXiAAoJEMFE2PTxn+Yw8iAMAKvOOemoyhDH2HcqqHC/0CJe h+kRqUMpYva4pWOD9vmZOaKWv9iKFTKawGXzy9XuJKN0+zprsyC4XyR/lZCI8qJ1 rpIUrUFE6I1p7jac+W8Zx0Y8+fmCWhZz3vhVIdIB1AuuSrY41OyonuFg6R1m52UQ sJ8itr4YZXzqXQY4OrTLQls2FoIH+VcqF4HgfxREpBcjAGKKTJ6bTQt8Lc6TM1c3 7AAHcWSuCPWCMhHECfwalsWA9/OpxzvF9pHLt5t3LkJPABACA8Ysq1vn3tmoAjAB HK773LawMcZB3acFyV0SqyoFtQJDYfn6UwJB44fL538q6Au5+rg0+tca9FmfuW7q 8/ZgIaRYNctsLQ+HEmWUnM53djlb7OjzOcL49PoT9/EX31b5YBY48yZ0KyJjd2x9 Rzhz0g+LM2za1F2zoXqtxLvuOof1Goz75oHe3OVl830UJOryw3CZU5nRgg1h7N1m 6cso9mmWDbbJephdG71BksCMDU7jEByFW2tlsNbm7Q== =KkOF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--