From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:04:32 -0800 Message-ID: References: <56DE0F6A.6010207@cs.ucla.edu> <83pov5rmt6.fsf@gnu.org> <56DFD78F.40205@cs.ucla.edu> <56E06093.7050509@cs.ucla.edu> <83twkfo7ij.fsf@gnu.org> <20160309181005.GF3948@acm.fritz.box> <87vb4vuu59.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87pov3nrnm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83mvq6n7xs.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1r2mzuy.fsf@gnu.org> <8360wumxj4.fsf@gnu.org> <831t7imqeg.fsf@gnu.org> <56E17325.5040503@gmail.com> <83vb4ula7g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457842052 1179 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2016 04:07:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 04:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: evgeny.panasyuk@gmail.com, Sven Axelsson , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 05:07:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aexJQ-0000dj-93 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:07:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aexJP-0000ar-KH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:07:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aexIw-0008Tu-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aexIv-0003o2-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]:33006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aexIr-0003m7-4V; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n190so188715320iof.0; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:06:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=54ZQvpp0LHYBEpmpxT3QN2y3rVgHgmgdXRYa4qhyWfk=; b=IG2TiMpOkNNkD60BiYGC0OQ1J4dv6xVuLO9Pdum0ki3RacCM67o1ZVCWtsyJVtkzm4 eICfujTS5+3Q0QNjk/HEoRhEj1u6d2pFt2yUiqFwOMPL1dNioDbeeupfVZxkW55UEKfg 59q1pm1x3NLK73mxu+teL46r+j73j1BKOMiCR2oDDHpjuu07BMVlS/oRJORNJLurT2df I9A6c87POyPTKw4pGxQWRSLxSlJHoa4Igb2e5BIrMXaTIjgUDUEH9sSrj8ECbEEvZgPl oQ+kRdg7qs5VZZWtXjTVRMQ5sWZaYiRgfTW+oDetbJQNnYy0hXRU3Z3UKEFT657kNdOP 2O/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=54ZQvpp0LHYBEpmpxT3QN2y3rVgHgmgdXRYa4qhyWfk=; b=MLL6sYMTkF1DJWMqiR8Q42Vqb0MyK0Hb1pSFV8QX9YEh0UvDEuTzqgy3K5RSm9AzSC 3cR49R1orWAPXh6pAs27LH+LT1sdDBnaz7vNnfqZbhXTicehKZzCgr8tPCXWhRxm8xi4 oblHJYI+kEXnIbyY2+pDtaejU4fAYXm46cN4zx6KAL8WPdAH7gcNE8ZgNuEGtkZG1bSx xKv6ApoIXNyN/ceuyoxOJKfClUxZJHWs48ghDHfeNwUFOLwBp5t11gbh2SwzaLBdA4rF EDkNqOTHq049BjRof47uHzXUUXtZGJrvEOUaeo+fJ01LtjdUGPg6as6zjxfGfIwFuarX 9Nyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJnEhOqM082TUX6MgTCmNNmM+qn8zFS93846GyRiKUk6S9dF8o9EEv89oGW0NqODw== X-Received: by 10.107.132.210 with SMTP id o79mr16750894ioi.118.1457842012234; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:06:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Hermes.local (mail.johnwiegley.com. [208.82.103.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm4066466iga.6.2016.03.12.20.06.51 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:06:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Hermes.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3B7F64F27F5B; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:06:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83vb4ula7g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:43:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.92 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Sven Axelsson , evgeny.panasyuk@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201581 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > If using "git replace" to fix a mistake in a log message is as simple as > saying "git replace --edit SHA1" followed by "git push", then perhaps > someone would like to try this for a while in a test repository, and if that > gives good results, we could start using that. I'll give it a try and see how well it fits with the other proposal I made today. If 'git replace' is better/easier than maintaining our own separate amendments file, then it sounds nice. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2