From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arash Esbati Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69081: 29.1; M-x throwing error with ConTeXt mode Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:46:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86bk8jxdr8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15996"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69081-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: shofly12@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 11 08:47:56 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaO3-0003wY-IT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:47:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaNe-0003Lf-Vr; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaNc-0003Kk-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaNc-0007cB-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaOA-0005E6-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:48:02 -0400 Resent-From: Arash Esbati Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 69081 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 69081@debbugs.gnu.org, arash@gnu.org, shofly12@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 69081-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D69081.171014325820050 (code D ref 69081); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69081-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2024 07:47:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38605 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaNm-0005DK-C7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaNj-0005D6-S5 for 69081-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjaN6-0007UN-Dc; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:46:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=9lxbeax9wu+zuK2jvZyvKCrD+873CMXbdB+UwIVLykc=; b=loWtQU/5mRHQQs1DbtHa T1QjyXLHfmHrY9mQdzQoiAQBqQKm2Fcd7gV38ZQpGWIu12a5sLEMfrhYf0YR6oi0AjMUVny03B4dT qx75XYaUYJMIc/+DOz6A0RBtV1u3HbbfXH25wUQcmUL5nQxF/BaIg3VAhBvuxUrRZFbYf8vsq5Hdi Mf+Yv+laKhYiWr8/zkCPzWKSX584JYE+pKDPeNX+G/fUMh6z8ihhy1WDjh6m3HkEdGZlXPMV9WcVA yXje5iCTT3t9lcKZB/x7AEqCseW9qzC1rNEGu0WRNkRxC6Fa/PyqtM8M1ObwppV7H3S9GYYk2cANt wEI0i0HSq0XOwA==; In-Reply-To: (Arash Esbati's message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:49:47 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:281457 Archived-At: Arash Esbati writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Is this specific to AUCTeX 13 upgrading to 14, or is this a general >> rule with any upgrade of AUCTeX? > > The former. There were some changes to the internals of AUCTeX in order > to sort out the mode names -- AUCTeX now provides `LaTeX-mode' and > doesn't touch `latex-mode' anymore (this applies also to the other > provided modes). > > So the update process is somewhat cumbersome for this specific release, > but we think it is worth it. This is the full announcement in case you > want to have a look[1]. No response after almost 4 weeks, therefore I'm closing this report. We can re-open if the issue is still around. Best, Arash