Re: update-subdirs and lisp/term

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > A remnant from past, perhaps, when lisp/term held only
>> >> >> >> >> > terminal-specific files?
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> Doesn't it still do?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > No.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> In which way?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > All of them.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Please expand.  In which way is term/vt100.el not terminal-specific?
>> >> >
>> >> > I didn't mean vt100.el (or its ilk).
>> >> 
>> >> ??? But it is one of them.
>> >
>> > Yes, but not the only one.
>> 
>> But you said "all of them", which includes vt100.el.
>
> "All of them" was a response to the question "in which way".  IOW,
> "in all of the ways", not "all of the files".

But they are all terminal-specific in some way.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."