From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] org-wl: Remove dependency on w3m macro `w3m-anchor'
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:21:49 -0600
Message-ID: <m28w76tnvm.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1274538559-13584-1-git-send-email-dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<874oi0vwjc.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46227 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHN83-00020C-25
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1OHN80-0003Q4-Mv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:01 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f192.google.com ([209.85.222.192]:63045)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1OHN80-0003Pm-D1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:00 -0400
Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so4076661pzk.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 26 May 2010 13:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <874oi0vwjc.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Sat, 22
	May 2010 16:30:31 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.ed> writes:

> Again, forgot to mention: Patch is available on

David, Can you please explain for me the rationale behind this change?

Thanks, John