From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs lisp syntax rfc: (cond (EXPR => (lambda (X) ...))) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:24:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87tyhoa67u.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <20110105.234046.1611011828799323301.hanche@math.ntnu.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294302317 23481 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2011 08:25:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 06 09:25:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pal9j-0002pj-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:25:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60354 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pal9i-0005cg-NL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56074 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pal9R-0005bh-PV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pal93-0005kM-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pal93-0005k3-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pal91-0002Vj-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:24:27 +0100 Original-Received: from dial-179134.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.179.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:24:27 +0100 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by dial-179134.pool.broadband44.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:24:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-179134.pool.broadband44.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7LIS2LkUpMa6FILHNa1kMxLRsmQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134329 Archived-At: * Stefan Monnier [2011-01-06 00:10] writes: > and have exp1 only evaluated the first time var is used. But we don't > want to add laziness, do we? Can't you add those exotic cases to pcase? Or perhaps add a pcond and a plet. Please keep cond as it is. Helmut