Specifying multiple latex headers for export in properties block

Specifying multiple latex headers for export in properties block

[Alan Schmitt]

Hello,

If I've understood things correctly, the canonical way to change export
options for a subtree export is to put them in a properties block. I
noticed that if I put several "EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER" entries in the
properties block, only the first one is taken into account.

Is it supposed to work this way? Is there a way around it?

Thanks a lot,

Alan

Re: Specifying multiple latex headers for export in properties block

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:

> If I've understood things correctly, the canonical way to change export
> options for a subtree export is to put them in a properties block. I
> noticed that if I put several "EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER" entries in the
> properties block, only the first one is taken into account.
>
> Is it supposed to work this way? Is there a way around it?

This is limitation from property drawers: each property can only appear
once. You may want to set a special latex_class (through
EXPORT_LATEX_CLASS property) for this subtree and fill its template with
the required headers.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Specifying multiple latex headers for export in properties block

[Alan Schmitt]

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:
>
>> If I've understood things correctly, the canonical way to change export
>> options for a subtree export is to put them in a properties block. I
>> noticed that if I put several "EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER" entries in the
>> properties block, only the first one is taken into account.
>>
>> Is it supposed to work this way? Is there a way around it?
>
> This is limitation from property drawers: each property can only appear
> once. You may want to set a special latex_class (through
> EXPORT_LATEX_CLASS property) for this subtree and fill its template with
> the required headers.

Yes, this is indeed a solution. It's a bit harder to tweak, but for that
phase one can use a very long line with all the headers.

Thanks for the suggestion,

Alan