From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57309: 29.0.50; Build error "trying to dump non fixed-up eln file" Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 12:45:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87zgfznjvz.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu67njdq.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmgvniyh.fsf@gnus.org> <83lerhdhuz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5722"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 57309@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 21 12:46:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiT8-0001J6-BC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 12:46:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiT6-0000HL-U1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiSx-0000Gy-4K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiSw-0006cJ-Il for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiSw-0006Vo-Bg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 10:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57309 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57309-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57309.166107871524960 (code B ref 57309); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 10:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57309) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2022 10:45:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiSB-0006UW-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f42.google.com ([209.85.218.42]:39474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPiS9-0006UF-5q for 57309@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 06:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u15so7595182ejt.6 for <57309@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 03:45:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc; bh=T8rGgvzPnfPqh7Oy3K0C/Fu/aUkyButgKzOwbcDBPG0=; b=LBZMPEB8SHlIhyBOe24BQznMmM8+uYDqceu/ae4zjBGOwOnCdeqmUWAYbWbs8QQgG4 qHaT88EzUdd00elBOGEV2WdFUtFa5Y+u5ekmGRCSFganxpQyYe2duCUOEyLHjGK3peng 3y7OqG62o8KAglUCFO4w95dPVKkgIIEajF9i5WgGDwJUdZrqGMZM1vC8je9YL4kmmqq2 0s4apSKqa8Po0MToB8L3e8qCcM4vFS56bs8d60SrjK/UbyVdkz8CK8w6dmN3yy51iTuP /Rezju4+nptYWMR+yF3tASQDqx3VkBGOBn17gv4/AvV+Jg/dhWPWbRTb+2oz9KmTJEMv RHcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=T8rGgvzPnfPqh7Oy3K0C/Fu/aUkyButgKzOwbcDBPG0=; b=EiGWpdwCwTFhIijgwJEcA+4/UKwdzeuTOkYqrsZoNpdeRFYnkTMvpOpeMam1MHZpit 9X0n9wI2zLUhdCFcat49dIh1PwV+HRuEbpGZbGbZ/2CRFZlND3IVMUCgELVn5ARR2lfS T5dVlwkIh4wz1Tm+BVFgjF/ZtJEu7oeWlVayWPT7tHfZcRZ1s8O3bqia62nuU9PPaUjM 6AU/P179NPTaLSRQWMojns2n1S+P0Gc5c4glVy5nwdJ7R3canC6pBUQBPx8XgiqwstmX fFncO6sbpDST5iulI4r/bNFpOgSvkc21fHc8Clq8yHbyYkMb0ClE775hX3ZLdDCMph8j BiVA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2+3YQEvuxWEnCvHmAa9K0qwFCyYUYbkjY6GQsj7zM0TVdkxKTw ilFrnvwub1a6pfeHxHMQhCk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4LhfOGHTqqBscYhl00QEw5uhVMQRt1vxAXmfPimEHyZ4eZFsSbWsq3jgvT3O59HkARZqbMAA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7349:b0:730:5f86:129a with SMTP id dq9-20020a170907734900b007305f86129amr1751579ejc.466.1661078707131; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 03:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Mini.fritz.box (p54b0cf60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.176.207.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1-20020a1709060cc100b00734a9503bcasm4705571ejh.135.2022.08.21.03.45.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 03:45:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lerhdhuz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2022 13:13:40 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240292 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I've removed src/emacs and src/bootstrap-emacs, and said "make". That > succeeded, but most of the preloaded files were loaded as *.elc. Then > I touch'ed every .el file that is preloaded, and said "make" again. > This ELC+ELN-compiled all of them, and then successfully loaded and > dumped them. > > Not sure what that means, but maybe try the same recipe? That it succeeds is kind of what I'm afraid of :-). I think Lars mentioned that a simple second make run made things work for him, and now I'm afraid if I leave the debugger or touch anything, I won't be able to reproduce the error again. BTW, I think I've seen the same bug with the last change to Makefile.in, only with a different error message "...incoherent something...", where Lars mentioned he had seen that sort of error ca. once per month or so. Something is really fishy here. It reminds me a bit of situtations when people don't take conservative stack marking into account, and then mistakenly assume that objects will be removed during the next GC after removing the last reference to it from their Lisp data structure. Which is mistaken because of disingeneous references from the C stack. But I also don't know how that would come into play here.