From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13663: 24.2.93; Why warn `flet' is an obsolete macro at runtime? Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:38:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360582791 15145 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2013 11:39:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13663@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 11 12:40:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjz-0003GC-S5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:40:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjg-0006is-NL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjc-0006iZ-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjb-0004t5-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:44 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjb-0004sy-FH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rju-0003eq-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13663 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13663-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13663.136058276213989 (code B ref 13663); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13663) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2013 11:39:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjF-0003dZ-Ac for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:54480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4rjC-0003dQ-2B for 13663@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3Z4Q4c4jVXz3hhZ8; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:38:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3Z4Q4c2wJKzbbcR; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:38:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4EasAIWgzEfw; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:37:34 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: qPR0CR7Cg6NMTtc5GwcW7mV2g4M9rEjIrXrYM1ks2LM= Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-154-56.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.154.56]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:38:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3D100CA2A1; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:38:55 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Boy, am I glad it's only 1971... In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:18:43 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71052 Archived-At: Leo Liu writes: > The problem can not be resolved by recompiling message.el. Looks more > serious. Perhaps the warning is actually triggered by some hook or advice? There is no use of flet anywhere in gnus. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."