From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove special requirement to disable startup message. Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:38:37 -0800 Message-ID: References: <878u4qdpd4.fsf@udel.edu> <83si2xt967.fsf@gnu.org> <20151222190949.GB5310@holos> <8760z65k03.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452127157 10305 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 00:39:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mark Oteiza , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 01:39:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGybc-0004zI-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 01:39:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56496 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGybY-0006mZ-Md for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:39:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGybL-0006mE-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:38:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGybK-0003Hb-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:38:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]:35087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGybG-0003Fw-Kk; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id do7so6538063pab.2; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:38:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=eZaAsltjssMj8xbVyUA+zjdIilj5VPfNs1OYAYlnBnk=; b=HZIWN/a+Zs3z6iPDUWUM/tcEzl2741uR/FQleO/cnNYsWKG5TtT0IJFDuExV7tCihc iC0GcIoGR1Z5N/nvPcUmFDLXZuoI0Shieav/W+8D9Tnth5zrAPFzSyegf4y36VLiDfKt GDxkFqvnA3VptWPnJj4Qz3rrkj79ouzin6ZOtlgw16biRBw/gQ+dAXIiw3zPvTyTMXNt WfJQEKm8UBqsbLbBkKb4If9fruV0PlkiQUPVohAQBO+O6GFxGdpDm28RyqKvdgWPHisK NXysad6HmZLPttFUg8tiQjZSbQuRVFS2meimkT2Mj/Zb0g4qij+vGCI5z253dY4LSRxs pDLA== X-Received: by 10.66.139.234 with SMTP id rb10mr144336809pab.82.1452127125900; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:38:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cq4sm28652698pad.28.2016.01.06.16.38.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:38:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 666BB121E84B3; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:38:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8760z65k03.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:08:28 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord), Mark Oteiza , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197714 Archived-At: >>>>> Phillip Lord writes: > Not wishing to restart a discussion I largely missed, but would anyone > object to me fixing the FIXME? comment. I would also like to extend the > docstring with a short explanation. > The code may be sensible from a freedom point-of-view, but it would make > more sense if the documentation explained and reinforced this. Sure, an explanatory comment would be good. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2