From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: evaluating numbers Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:55:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871ruk2d3f.fsf@gmx.net> <3C929D7B-1C10-4713-9EDA-55C80FC36AD8@traduction-libre.org> <835zjvg385.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgmyd6rw.fsf@gnu.org> <835zjucwbz.fsf@gnu.org> <628A3663-BDD3-47C5-B4F4-E260FD900691@traduction-libre.org> <83o8xla50f.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ex9sow.fsf@gnu.org> <4836980E-C425-466C-BB86-5E962C4B3F96@traduction-libre.org> <83zhgy7qxq.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfsi5z1s.fsf@gnu.org> <83imnm480f.fsf@gnu.org> <834kz52mqx.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ep2m17.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="220575"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 16:56:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdxZ-000vEq-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:56:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41088 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdxW-0004Td-TJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:56:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdwL-0004QF-Bf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:55:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdwK-0003SK-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]:42753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdwK-0003Ry-59; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:55:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id a15so11498403wrf.9; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:55:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gg9xepkmND8GfIfGXc3MjBX4Cza0NjLSykxnow1/Dh0=; b=IPeXFrLxf4gjFBlMU2hgyv0HRVInRXNZQ3Owp7nxlLUk1uOeJzU5O8HZkjN7YcE5oq cmSRMRq8I/DOMwmIebhGDiGfpXGF3j0x5dkA0f20CKY7H/IBaGwWqJIVBqxmjbEWt5W3 xr/NzdhFKYb1TvefsTVC7QtnzJ4tWJxIh24SGK6rDyWwWCAeF6ihfFjI56YMqhu/UCZq fX3t3/4VTD7hSTyDLq3M/3VSXcwdeOsIYxYhmSCEGFf0wjJROS6YPnrfkKoSV7X1pnyp kBFIFhrQ+a+BFxKCku4zdb6EKfYzw0qMBRMel6FWwlE0alJdvH0S5uuAErpNfAe5rFQl rDOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gg9xepkmND8GfIfGXc3MjBX4Cza0NjLSykxnow1/Dh0=; b=MEnYFKuqiUBADcc9CH49jWTw/ZCBBD9aO1Xv49rp7wDclPHVd6T4sobFTqs4ndK+M1 UZwmY4dND2VN0gdMEcH7dSuaCNxyuHYc8BqBZFrC0qzXmrPYoV3Oxsca+/uGjyAB0SOF dis/MuJAvFKcSGQ2BH5uPSOVYGbQUNb3iDCfX554g6XkJDTTAHmMhd7OC2V7ngrLweJz EvgELCISD5X7xZfKBXWNOT4zoZ55lCeXj3cPtnysQdLixgnKZ+vJclB0l2tPpjpY2UOc RL5qwGjYK6rGzbdKpECOT2djkBqMrAAiNDYphFfg7kH4mp9YZkyr5HTT4d0cLauAQomM RrAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWOirrHgSdKmjrIyKmae3ysiPFPmNkimd71zQoX6ctVBpv7hdkH EMnGiDATimztsGrLWLO9aLkhZJRNy+s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2+jo8ZEheTY/6UYJLssvtEzdVaflocdPJtamsIeEXyzC0DQ9DOgnnfxCTiQcTkrLrrJFETQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4b82:: with SMTP id b2mr16221046wrt.335.1573833314338; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:55:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t133sm15667598wmb.1.2019.11.15.07.55.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:55:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8336ep2m17.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:32:04 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242236 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:32:04 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:16:38 +0200 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.c= om, >> eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org >>=20 >> > + (char-name-fmt (if what-cursor-show-names >> > + (format ", ?\\N{%s}" (get-char-code-p= roperty char 'name)) >>=20 >> What does this yield for codepoints below 32 decimal? Eli> And, btw, why the ?\N{} part? why not just show the name? So that people can directly use it elsewhere, without having to do C-x 8 RET. But it=CA=BCs a minor detail, I=CA=BCm certainly not wedded to it. Robert