From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:09:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83369o1khx.fsf@gnu.org> <83imijz68s.fsf@gnu.org> <831rp7ypam.fsf@gnu.org> <86wo6yhj4d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83o8sax803.fsf@gnu.org> <86pncpffmk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83v9mgx2a1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="34705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 13:10:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKKDM-0008tU-SC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:10:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKKDL-0003Iz-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKKCh-0002FE-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:09:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKKCg-0007M2-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]:34710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKKCg-0007Kg-J6; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id 65so8057975wrl.1; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:09:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HxLuZr0hVVFMQZihOU7+hINZ+WHSnqtlK1F+i7Fj0G8=; b=mUxiehVNQzaU8mtImO3alKk1kJjrN2VcFMZXRC7UTcQZzWZmUHG7CrPHM5ngFzvOgG AUj35kPuxp1muZaQNmAZj1exZbkdss8nvJe3052CRd6iizbGBqmtyjxXsca/zxKQi/8M iUnzWNV1eCWatxhLFYeT2PAFmh2KvnPG0TIFtVaTMD7gWEtB2z0NycXAorNxVo0gciQP s3YTtuSaCZ+h/f9+TgG68RWWRP6W5Z2zMCS9XxaRcfBjP0wBBwnoPxfF3cpd6nyaHz4Z Mh+r+CdNS9O8F34KJDjhHANpdoFBtDbBhNma8FRM8sJPdqQ1/nkWEORJoNRh37I3DOpX bwtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HxLuZr0hVVFMQZihOU7+hINZ+WHSnqtlK1F+i7Fj0G8=; b=o8EWdkrrIPN09w1T+edb0GLgOodaAPs2ZdTAYJ1ZGiMyCsxLzwWhPU70LvaQyQ+KNA tmTihz0nO6TNwNakBD9qSJ8QJakWhqpvSKRQRpu+8ek8zVhAxKL7Svpa37RDTz3ZvKRk UNQo+0DZoRkMK0I5vD3a9h5Vkyw45z1tiWKI6qEwuhfS5fmfbuSrHtvEelC34nm5Bw5f L7GUFGamjvNz0QIKuuZhiQoDGSojjat3QtGIVSp+BDq5a90M4bcDqZ8SngMa1lIG8fRo R5nw6S6qMzwcAC5qLL4+uj9juh30kdDcN1STX2fcxJ2c3nfezEaZXR2m5zoirlzFzyL6 rc+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaxIPN3KCwjBDZLG/0Tt0DPfFR6YvKM8WauBhzPqvoUbezrZeCY ioGcpmMBu7yqfQNreU9tycS+P4Lz X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ+7K5bNy+lG4VAo7CPMWvD68QGt+duzZbZHtVwdrLYa+M/Pugc1aRMZ74vFjg7EmWZtZz5pA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a343:: with SMTP id d3mr7969217wrb.50.1585912176625; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:30c1:b817:7653:c738]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j188sm11553850wmj.36.2020.04.03.04.09.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 04:09:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83v9mgx2a1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:00:06 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::429 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246315 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:00:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:11:07 +0200 >> Cc: emacs-devel >>=20 Stephen> I don't understand what the alternative is. The parser imposes= the Stephen> reasonable requirement that the input text be utf-8 (or possib= ly some Stephen> other standard format). Emacs raw buffer text is not utf-8, so= we must Stephen> do some encoding. >>=20 >> It=CA=BCs pretty close, apart from raw bytes. Eli> Not only raw bytes: also some characters that cannot be unified wi= th Eli> Unicode. And again: how likely are those characters to be in source code? Robert