>>>>> Oleh Krehel <ohwoeowho@gmail.com> writes:

>> +1
>> 
>> I wholeheartedly agree to that.

> +1 from me as well. I recall recently Richard proposed that we vote on some
> new isearch feature. Should we vote on renaming `cl-caddr' -> `caddr' as
> well?

> Here's a list of `cl-' stuff that I like to use, which I think wouldn't
> bring confusion without a `cl-' prefix: `cl-find-if', `cl-remove-if-not',
> `cl-incf', `cl-position-if', `cl-caadr', `cl-rotatef',
> `cl-destructuring-bind'.

+100 from me. I deeply dislike the cl- prefix, especially for common things
like incf and loop. It's both excessive, and annoying to program with.

I would like to see prefix-less aliases for many of the functions in cl-lib.
Let's create a module cl-intf that requires cl-lib and provides those aliases;
and then allow cl-intf to be used in core, so long as we ensure that cl-intf
never shadows existing Emacs Lisp functions also in core.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2