From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 2 release blocking bugs left for 25.1! Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:43:49 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87fus6vkh9.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466534717 22665 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 18:45:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 20:45:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQfW-0008V4-Hh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53650 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQfV-0004ty-LR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQeh-0004sT-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQea-0004kq-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]:36740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQeZ-0004ke-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id t190so9117310pfb.3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:44:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=JUlzPlsIDp35hBgEr1TuAAUaqdZHCIKw4Rqp/yE2Bhk=; b=XsWEqNfH/iBgbn4iJQhcA+yFG/z7yl4JgTQZ9MbeZKN2hYI1FG58wqTQy+mfcyDjY0 2HwBNSxO5/mUjtl2mG50/ckNY6b/azakvE4Bqg2QfAI7KBalqmGB1gzMCOl4a6qGt9qX evyVh6T9wgVHbiX1ulhQ0uMYlhLv6NYwZ9cQFiN3YNq3w6MP6YD9LWPUVjA/5JqZC213 PflGvmSEGTZfPuCV8VXeiABcLr9xfHcwb1EuHUrcENK0fFZ7xwDK+6YW2rmWdJIe2T0n t6WY9CmlSDHQHTZi0k1tgfK0Ji0cbBIzb8lie3jw1HQijamVBeLypqhDKgnV/TNbmzIJ 8fjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=JUlzPlsIDp35hBgEr1TuAAUaqdZHCIKw4Rqp/yE2Bhk=; b=aj2nZjorPNST+STbesIdp9HwGenrxMOgwU9IrumKE4jQvYTSuWWDXVwB1zczzn3Hsy QiTPXhDwAvA2hbgUHsLhdl82QKFJL/LYlGdgxJvThW7CTe/Ogn9Pq+mS2rIUg8xh56uy vYtEa91unwsEIz6Ti09l6iUC7LvE3PLnFVzTwU1S+bg4aCjjyJTJpCthp/CYyCynLWPG HTAWG8orhy4++YcXyIPTtawFypkJn+LnzclXKd3Y+B52LsYYOrAUo5tWdKLBQk/yeNoF /dZDW3ObZ3pQFtjCAIn/i8Opys7jagQ9isO3nK9F4UAR9ysM7by/S2gliSuAJ4jhU+JA 4WHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIhDUh6JDKzFVV7c2gt291HgB9ri+N861aPbGrAip1Wl+BjNu2RvcnH7FNW8w/j4Q== X-Received: by 10.98.22.198 with SMTP id 189mr29760201pfw.74.1466534642932; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k74sm85348303pfk.78.2016.06.21.11.43.59 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id BE8A19E3C64; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:43:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:07:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.95 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204647 Archived-At: >>>>> Stefan Monnier writes: >>>> I'd like to suggest 23785 as a blocker also -- the bug (in the report) is >>>> not too serious, but as a fix may involve a change in the command loop, >>>> I'd rather do this before a RC. >>> If the bug is not too serious, can you explain the rationale for making it >>> a blocker? >> The symptoms are not too serious, but it's a bug in the undo system, so may >> have significant implications elsewhere. > And it's a regression in 25.1 due to the new undo code. This does sounds like a blocker, then. What are the repercussions for fixing the issue? Will it need a full round of pretesting to become ready for the release candidate? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2