From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrew Hyatt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4710: 23.1.50; Bad display of underlines crossing line boundaries Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:15:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E75B5FE.1030208@dogan.se> <4515BD8DE6284A249A67403FC1292685@us.oracle.com> <67910CA13BCC481CB3F0E99477C8AC97@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468470316 15371 80.91.229.3 (14 Jul 2016 04:25:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen' , 'Stefan Monnier' , 4710@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 14 06:25:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bNYCu-00058D-KK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 06:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNYCt-0002zX-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNY4F-0008R5-Ai for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNY4B-0003jN-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNY4A-0003jI-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNY4A-0007mm-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrew Hyatt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4710 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4710-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4710.146846975429907 (code B ref 4710); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4710) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2016 04:15:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNY42-0007mJ-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:36288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNY3x-0007m4-Qv for 4710@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 82so63136138qko.3 for <4710@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Z4mytehVGMOCFS68xAxJ0w8WriW2xvA+owCqrzO2ndw=; b=cVfObQOkK4wkh+RzodQJPti4SnpFjdLTsilc6cw6qbn+bb8vLbDQ3aNNEL9LeyI8VX GWBfvKwgAYuwGnyL9gpCsyBSB1wIDxy33XsOZxBdvbX8jrMi+jyKONu/RyvgC2bBhq8z hxOtE75fY5WVSTIfWbCtMpvQB6PUAtKX9uWReyFsuQf69aHuFXTbz1FM0InCmxSLLmlU q/v2NgD6l9GFCISeKkNRR+Znu31ufcAS1RZYzO8OPDoBGbJ+8CbU2DEgaRgtc2jBEa90 heS7wmD6WiDwpIgtom7p0JTaodQbeWMonC1f0018nP0Xfp3To77+wzwUxzBcNwO5Fc77 gfew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Z4mytehVGMOCFS68xAxJ0w8WriW2xvA+owCqrzO2ndw=; b=m5brHLGkhtR96gVrMjGtMBeOOLTUZn7NeH8I53Oi5kUyEj9HPgpQbFolWDEQryzwKd DVhdcexXr+Tc61rpVlNM9SGar5UmGk6fGb0hDL6JoFnuioxnaiK9LPPMMt8FoKD1Y0az deHZZw/1+RruruUQOsOolYnN8FcYrRduNdaa2szd7dgfMtwKrJnnMor/6rDis5UyScyF kkKkJC5IgY8sR1u5AR6wWzC87pl3Cq9fkwNli0TMLUS1CrHS6EmePr8v/QO41MJLdRry IwxcxtS7rFyCgoTEYXAw7C0A8cW+X89PjdS7rUrCEBeUgaFdoBHQbjXinZ8JWZpcs2XY EK9A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLFWSMzd8X4GRf8lC/GA31QOooJEhdEoOc6rbEV0T0C6oV7GeKgFNaJiiHfQ5dHlA== X-Received: by 10.55.192.143 with SMTP id v15mr14460155qkv.23.1468469744477; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Andrews-MacBook-Pro.local (cpe-74-73-128-199.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.73.128.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p39sm226776qtp.14.2016.07.13.21.15.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:15:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <67910CA13BCC481CB3F0E99477C8AC97@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:05:06 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121055 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> > Not doing so could give the impression that there is >> > actually a break (change) in the face attributes when >> > there is not. If you do that, then perhaps some additional >> > display artifact should convey that - >> > e.g., perhaps a different fringe marker. >> >> Again, you seem to be confused: I'm specifically talking about "face >> continuations", i.e. ways to express the fact that the face continues >> rather than being broken. That's the whole point of the two ? in >> my example. Please make sure there's an actual disagreement before >> jumping on your keyboard ;-) > > Great, so you jumped on your keyboard to express your violent agreement. ;-) > > At any rate, it looks like your and my proposals for such a > line-wrapping-without-breaking case, while perhaps interesting, do not > correspond to the bug reported. > > It appears that the OP was indeed about face extension across (hard) line breaks > into indented text on the next line. > > That was what my original response was to: If it hurts, don't do it; and let's > not assume that whitespace should not show the face attributes of the adjacent > text just because it represents indentation. Now we are almost 5 years into the future, and this bug hasn't been updated. Drew's response didn't get agreement or disagreement, so would anyone object if we considered this not a bug, as he suggests?