From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Helping with MPS Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:56:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877ccbb3a9.fsf@protonmail.com> <87frqy5quh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39573"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Pip Cet , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jonathon McKitrick To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 21 08:57:07 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sgfHG-000AA4-Pp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:57:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgfGx-0001g2-DD; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 02:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgfGv-0001fY-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 02:56:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgfGu-000841-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 02:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5bec87ececeso5437955a12.0 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724223402; x=1724828202; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X0EiH1pfrkC/g5H6RyxUZdSWPDgxva7GVt2U2LjgG68=; b=JpVmJGikHmyRcVM+/LQTqHrzQebd7p0KmZQBcaD+9acspQ5Kj3hNB7sRyl8yOC5gAG HTw2COJkIGO9pv/2s1M4JPf1w/SpOQzVuELgmGKXEUNcM7ji0NysoLpDGytMKUkQk6iG g60nyihu+ofHWaErqmSmiNsqu5K9cHApPye5BPV8382tg2h5L+sckxp4zQ6sptPWYmL3 ed42zi6p5JtsG0V0/FPa8CBAG3tH8xCY97XNjHVFxStDG4aM+qGVktq5jX94FF8ioFO4 UJp7rhDi1hMrFT3dwha4w1DKldX3fjeJhRcDDbXhdUS7NYKr/t+Khdugffgzf3NdmFHY rnUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724223402; x=1724828202; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=X0EiH1pfrkC/g5H6RyxUZdSWPDgxva7GVt2U2LjgG68=; b=A/PsG/zHusK7qTv8bzGRw7h8YkoXoq4S1w3m4IsOZPAL7YLYggjc5gzyekiQWWOGO7 jtBz2C0WTupMjN8+LiLpoAvtQF0bzTw2pQeKh4a1DVuibWTiWaLyQT2xj7aDepDhuK/1 ALcWxyQwqaI1otBq1EKunwXh4K1yK96Ad97w/IFQb5+fPbbhEtkf9V00SVsmP4YwU4Pt ivHiAVp60ZCHxlVzXVWXa2dwhRI826vno4R2rsueKkKisxCYNEJ4fERhh+U0agiFtVcZ VdA73gP1J+SUiLJtVfkqRHErWq10dUibS1Bj0eHH+izV4bMx8aP6Q7U8Eiuwcbp+4gzL ferg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVc/Vl2p08ZHwqY+ur9cKhr8DSbhUDqyWBtpc8597ovFI7yMAQdEhc0af6Q1qJ7D4nEeyvbwr5fxwo8Ig==@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzk6I+rkhQHWDpKnS2PhwA/gMiwo8Lfcn3M7xpv/QEmid5PlwrC 8QExEXV4nGLpgwlZKbnLEZQ78FgVtSPaWTOBmhyZ0wGG4qqjZlVh X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETzr2Xs72/2/5nPx3g00x0Wn1bZZO+UVSF7L5ckOk4snhsEc4mIXhZ2xY5uiz42mwjx7rKxQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9406:b0:a7d:9f92:9107 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a866f893f3bmr93467266b.58.1724223402217; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3ae30.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.174.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a83838c6af1sm860552366b.45.2024.08.20.23.56.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:56:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87frqy5quh.fsf@gmail.com> (Helmut Eller's message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:31:50 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::532; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x532.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322990 Archived-At: Helmut Eller writes: > b) removes the instruction emulation on protection faults in the AWL > pool. For us, this adds a lot of complexity with questionable gains: > The weak hash tables implementation is, well, complicated and for the > marker-vector it's ineffective because there we use tagged pointers > (apparently without problems). I can't express how much I'm in favor of getting rid of that wart :-)