From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Frank Sonnemans Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Writing HTML, which emacs package? Date: 16 Feb 2004 22:11:36 +0100 Organization: -= Belgacom Usenet Service =- Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076966514 10811 80.91.224.253 (16 Feb 2004 21:21:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 16 22:21:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsqBX-0004PM-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:21:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Asq97-0005g6-N7 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:19:17 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!proxad.net!skynet.be!skynet.be!louie!tjb!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Original-Lines: 21 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.136.26.104 Original-X-Trace: DXC=TQ9K List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:16914 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:16914 Hi, I am currently using Emacs as my HTML editor together with html-helper mode. Even though this works pretty well, I am missing some features. Question is if there is a better package or should I just hack on the html-helper mode with my limited lisp skills. Missing for me are: - XHTML support, for example properly closing tag like
- Selectively making some functions interactive. For example I dont' want
  • to be interactive, but tags with multiple keywords such as the tag is easier to use in tempo-interacive mode. Any recommendations? Regards, Frank