From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:24:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> <87iregmafd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <86irefojcc.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86tzxzn0bx.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86ps8nmy95.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86d54nmve9.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <868xfbmthh.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <39229.128.165.123.18.1170864622.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171041933 6291 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2007 17:25:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: herring@lanl.gov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 09 18:25:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFZUu-0008VH-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:25:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFZUu-0006z8-8Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFZTw-0006AX-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:24:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFZTt-00068w-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:24:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFZTs-00068n-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HFZTs-0008QM-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so924685ugf for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:to:cc:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-sa-exim-connect-ip:x-sa-exim-mail-from:x-spam-checker-version:x-spam-level:x-spam-status:subject:x-sa-exim-version:x-sa-exim-scanned:sender; b=SsDJXH0mXdfd5rC2RxN2WZSeQGGKJw9KGZ534r3ev2GXRvxIk8CjGYrshz7n/r2EppHdMMFoV0h6uINHGnPa7ZhX9eCWGUhaHjneMPVVeg0AQRKqwkWiy8Ef8kd5gYcUIhiUU0NrxBi9zFaQgMMyFS0jMTldL3hP5wWt8FkGlmc= Original-Received: by 10.67.119.9 with SMTP id w9mr11504796ugm.1171041851204; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from chrislap.local ( [89.176.28.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 59sm5264173ugf.2007.02.09.09.24.08; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chrislap.local) by chrislap.local with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HFZTg-0002hX-Qn; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:24:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <39229.128.165.123.18.1170864622.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> (Stuart D. Herring's message of "Wed\, 7 Feb 2007 08\:10\:22 -0800 \(PST\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dooglus@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on chrislap.local) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66181 Archived-At: "Stuart D. Herring" writes: > Finally, the ".txt" extension here could just as easily be ".png"; if the > image is in fact a JPEG, we have the case where a user has just patched > their PNG library but not their JPEG library. I suppose that it is more > common to merely distinguish images from not, What about files with extensions of ".blah"? If they contain image data, are they misnamed? I would expect to be safe opening a .blah file, knowing that it's not a recognised extension, I feel safe knowing it'll be opening in fundamental-mode. It seems several people on the list would rather display this .blah file as an image.