From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string-match in unicode-2 (Re: Calc broken in Emacs unicode-2 branch) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:37:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ejq0rpxo.fsf_-_@vh213602.truman.edu> <87y7o5z7rv.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175294161 3466 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2007 22:36:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 30 13:30:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXFIs-0000Pg-Ep for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:29:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXFLY-0006i8-Pv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:32:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWqFn-0000UH-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWqFl-0000U5-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWqFl-0000U2-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWqDB-0001TB-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:42:26 -0400 X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]:56617) by ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1HWq8T-0001g4-Ou (Exim 4.63) (return-path ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:37:33 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Thu\, 29 Mar 2007 17\:00\:37 +0900") User-Agent: No Gnus v0.6, Emacs/23.0.0.4 (2007-03-28), Fedora 6 gnu/linux X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:32:42 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68788 Hello, Kenichi! On 2007-03-29, Kenichi Handa said: >>>> > Thank you for tracking down the bug to that code. As I found a >>>> > bug of multibyteness handling in regex code, I'm now working on >>>> > fixing it. >> > >> > I've just installed a fix for emacs-unicode-2 branch. > >> I have come back to emacs-unicode-2 branch. Indeed, it is fixed and so >> is the calc bug. > > ??? As far as I remember, the problem of calc was because of > the bug of regex. > > Do you mean that calc still has a problem even after the bug > of regex was fixed? It runs smoothly now ;) No problem so far. regards, -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)