From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: log format for vc-bzr Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:49:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200912081747.nB8HlwPR021836@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <874oo1w9y1.fsf@telefonica.net> <87tyw1uss6.fsf@telefonica.net> <200912082203.nB8M3FLP023771@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <87hbs1at4u.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <871vj3sxgy.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260395438 23824 80.91.229.12 (9 Dec 2009 21:50:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 09 22:50:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NIUQY-0003om-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:50:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58647 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIUQY-0000ZC-G0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NIUQ3-00009z-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:49:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NIUPx-00004q-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:49:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43569 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIUPx-0008WB-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:49:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:57082) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NIUPx-0002tC-73 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:49:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFAE1C0029D; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:49:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan2.mnet-online.de [192.168.1.215]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965B39043C; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:49:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.3.149]) by localhost (dynscan2.mnet-online.de [192.168.1.215]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPLYF5N9XZ7T; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:49:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from igel.home (DSL01.83.171.156.136.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [83.171.156.136]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:49:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5D0D2CA28F; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:49:51 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: .. I think I'd better go back to my DESK and toy with a few common MISAPPREHENSIONS... In-Reply-To: <871vj3sxgy.fsf@telefonica.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22=C3=93scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:29:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118491 Archived-At: =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> There is nothing wrong with that, but do that only in your private loc= al >> branch and don't publish those junk commits. They carry no value. > > What about the example I posted before? With the recommended distribute= d > workflow, you are going to *double* the history length with redundant > entries: > > 1343 Fixed bug #2423 (merge) > 1343.1 Fixed bug #2423 (original commit) > > Isn't that junk? Yes, there is no value in a merge like this, it can just as well put directly on the branch. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."