From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12081: 24.1; buffer-predicate often not called Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:07:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5015411C.30803@gmx.at> <50156DFA.8030104@gmx.at> <5016502A.8060300@gmx.at> <5016C779.2010902@gmx.at> <501799D4.1000707@gmx.at> <502A15C2.1000403@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344960510 15909 80.91.229.3 (14 Aug 2012 16:08:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alp Aker , 12081@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 14 18:08:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JfR-0006kR-2d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55710 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JfP-0003Fz-Vc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JfN-0003Fr-14 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:08:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JfL-00089K-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JfL-00089G-G1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:08:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1Jnh-0001Eb-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dave Abrahams Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12081 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12081-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12081.13449609654672 (code B ref 12081); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12081) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2012 16:16:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1Jmm-0001DJ-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.216.51]:45182) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1Jmj-0001Cu-Uy for 12081@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: by qadz3 with SMTP id z3so521745qad.3 for <12081@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Y1WNsd+PNshbAhvPzrUdE45wAF1+3fZUtrB6QfzboO8=; b=h+1inMTPzZwvSx8ckl6iQpfbJawODV8zb1aph8Gxs6cuhlGbNojzYfhqGeQ3pPKuSA 91HspXpvFLF+FEgUroO2mChABpyOv2pTXmeJDHN+9avvMADJ/jE+m3DUdjN3pp/psDnN IB2BWsO/U78rdQfBj1Lbq2cfeFDbckI6E2ZKNnuYVzQUWSCORaNNOhv68XVZk/U8zCV9 4axzNUP8adI9PPlEmL9HaBirazy5xM86rEOeleSgH4gQDWRwRwvigmZQ9DzSFWlqYbSs rpiu4b3UxBJTVnhy5vBgFGm8qR5hMpexTjc0DKk8/3faUoTuXwHRBCJx8W1OAw7vxBMa 71jA== Original-Received: by 10.224.214.67 with SMTP id gz3mr33978570qab.70.1344960442510; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pluto.luannocracy.com (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com. [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gq10sm4053709qab.18.2012.08.14.09.07.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by pluto.luannocracy.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id E1CEA5E09CA5; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:07:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <502A15C2.1000403@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:09:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlpz7UOMqLY7vbJykoTc8oCTGXgY8aOTRSVPW8SKI/fEjl8reklSDnAFziWMw/N6TeK4GOj X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63159 Archived-At: on Tue Aug 14 2012, martin rudalics wrote: >>> and `other-buffer' probably should not even care about this parameter. >> >> Why not? > > Do you need it apart from `kill-buffer', `bury-buffer' and > `replace-buffer-in-windows'? I don't know. I guess in part that depends on which other parts of emacs call those functions, and whether that set is guaranteed to be stable over time. I don't think it's currently documented or stable, which is why this probably seemed to the person who implemented the other-buffer functionality to "work" in some useful way. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost