From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:40:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: <081tbn5g02.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1v79mfz.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2p8ysz8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448336487 4962 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2015 03:41:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21953@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 04:41:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Ti-0002z0-8s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:41:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Td-0005a4-Tr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14TZ-0005Z1-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14TW-0004Pc-6r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a14TW-0004PY-48 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a14TV-00053s-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21953.144833641219370 (code B ref 21953); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2015 03:40:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Sh-00052L-Ov for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:35310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a14Se-00052B-V0 for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:40:09 -0500 Original-Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so6739471pac.2 for <21953@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:40:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=SxawsLRLiJHYN0DcgP/i7CcyNMyPM1JpS/JFC/IsyL8=; b=v2kPl3XSsbsUXSQjwwJaFJRcKZhRfucuUroMBpNupxVkKbXY3KyPY4AJkAaXunfY4v +6aihUbyfD5ZI0g1o34WvDvm6VPGGTWN20InxBJTiPW3V8s/fjfwBlMEL5EZrTrREfh7 crG20e//qUpOMUZBgTk8J6tWvwfzBpprO9TZIKOzfyzRMRhxinLSaRv41W2t4BMOFaQo H6glzBLBoFzCZONH6Bpz7/ehmquNtNehlspmL+V4yJ+NQ3hNz1/5MEhXbwrdhUops5G5 xJTBMn1HF5fteac7K5a1Ahmx3Z4/4Wgo4qJb4PLQfD8Q9ErIeATmiAj3KvES3KRV3GBf gqwA== X-Received: by 10.98.64.209 with SMTP id f78mr20014083pfd.74.1448336407927; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:40:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Hermes-2.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rn7sm12226675pab.23.2015.11.23.19.40.06 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:40:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Hermes-2.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9955B49BAE2A; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:40:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k2p8ysz8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:30:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109171 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > In any case, .elc files are pre-built in release tarfiles, so people >> > building releases don't even see these warnings. So making it a release goal >> > doesn't make sense to me. >> >> You know, that's a really good point. >> >> Perhaps this then: Development goal to reduce warnings as much as is feasible. >> Long-term development goal to eliminate them. Release is not block either way. >> >> How does that sound, Eli, if Drew is right about users not seeing the >> warnings? > I thought this was how things were anyway. Alright, business as normal then. John